Ankle Taping Does Not Affect Running Kinematics During a Treadmill Protocol in Well-Trained Runners: A Secondary Analysis from a Randomized Cross-Over Controlled Trial.

Background

The purpose of this randomized cross-over controlled trial was to evaluate the biomechanical effects of ankle taping using rigid tape (RT) or kinesiotape (KT) compared to no taping during treadmill running in well-trained amateur runners.

Methods

A total of 22 participants (15 men and 7 women) completed three running sessions on a treadmill, each lasting 30 min, under different conditions: no taping (CG), RT, and KT. Sagittal and frontal plane kinematics were analyzed using the Kinovea software to assess the ankle dorsiflexion, knee flexion, hip extension, tibial angle, foot strike pattern, heel eversion, and pelvic drop across three intervals (0-10, 10-20, and 20-30 min).

Results

The results demonstrated no significant differences in sagittal plane variables (ankle dorsiflexion, knee flexion, hip extension, and cadence) or frontal plane variables (heel eversion and pelvic drop) between the CG, RT and KT groups at any time point. Although heel eversion significantly increased over time due to fatigue, the taping conditions did not affect running kinematics.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that neither RT nor KT alters running biomechanics in well-trained runners over prolonged treadmill running. The study highlights that taping, commonly used to prevent ankle injuries, does not significantly modify lower limb kinematics in the absence of injury. Further research is needed to evaluate the effects of taping in novice or injured runners and under more demanding conditions, such as overground running.