Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2019
Randomized Trial of Deep Vein Thrombosis Chemoprophylaxis with Bemiparin and Enoxaparin in Patients with Moderate to High Thrombogenic Risk Undergoing Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Procedures.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Revilla-Peñaloza Francisco, Olsoff-Pagovich Paul Jay, Ochoa-Gomez Jose Ramon, Castaneda-Gaxiola Roberto, Rubio-Gayosso Ángel Iván, Ceballos Guillermo, Molina-Guarneros Juan Arcadio
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication during postoperative convalescence characterized by hypercoagulability, vascular endothelium damage and blood stasis. It increases noticeably in peri/postoperative phases of surgery procedures. Pulmonary embolism secondary to iliofemoral DVT is a frequent cause of death.
METHODS: Adult patients scheduled for plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRSx) with moderate to high thrombogenic risk were selected. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of bemiparin compared to enoxaparin as chemoprophylaxis for DVT. Following balanced general anesthesia techniques, patients were randomly assigned for subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 IU (Group-E) or bemiparin 3500 IU (Group-B) q24h starting 6 h after procedure conclusion for at least 10 days. All patients were evaluated for DVT through Doppler ultrasound mapping of the lower limbs.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were evaluated, mostly women (83%), physical status ASA II (59%), ASA III (10%); Caprini's thrombogenic risk score 3-4 (moderate) 58%, 5-6 (high) 29%, > 6 (too high) 13%; demographics, clinical variables and scores were similar between groups. Median drainage time in breast surgery was 4 days in both groups (p = 0.238). In the case of abdominal surgery, median was 14 days in Group-E versus 13 days in Group-B (p = 0.059). No DVT was detected in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: DVT was prevented with bemiparin, without significant bleeding increase nor adverse events; moreover, the cost of bemiparin is lower than enoxaparin. Bemiparin can be considered as alternative drug for DVT chemoprophylaxis in PRSx procedures.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
METHODS: Adult patients scheduled for plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRSx) with moderate to high thrombogenic risk were selected. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of bemiparin compared to enoxaparin as chemoprophylaxis for DVT. Following balanced general anesthesia techniques, patients were randomly assigned for subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 IU (Group-E) or bemiparin 3500 IU (Group-B) q24h starting 6 h after procedure conclusion for at least 10 days. All patients were evaluated for DVT through Doppler ultrasound mapping of the lower limbs.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were evaluated, mostly women (83%), physical status ASA II (59%), ASA III (10%); Caprini's thrombogenic risk score 3-4 (moderate) 58%, 5-6 (high) 29%, > 6 (too high) 13%; demographics, clinical variables and scores were similar between groups. Median drainage time in breast surgery was 4 days in both groups (p = 0.238). In the case of abdominal surgery, median was 14 days in Group-E versus 13 days in Group-B (p = 0.059). No DVT was detected in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: DVT was prevented with bemiparin, without significant bleeding increase nor adverse events; moreover, the cost of bemiparin is lower than enoxaparin. Bemiparin can be considered as alternative drug for DVT chemoprophylaxis in PRSx procedures.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.