Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2024
Virtual Assessment of Functional Mobility in Lower Extremity Prosthesis Clients: An Exploratory Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
DadeMatthews Oluwagbemiga, Roper Jaimie A, Vazquez Adan, Shannon David, Sefton JoEllen M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between patient perception of lower extremity function and a home-based virtual clinician assessment of mobility in lower limb prosthesis clients.
DESIGN: Descriptive observational study using a clinician-administered functional mobility survey and timed Up and Go test to assess lower extremity function under supervision.
SETTING: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant online virtual platform.
PARTICIPANTS: Twelve lower limb loss clients currently using prostheses, aged ≥19 years, not pregnant, and with no stroke, seizure disorder, or cancer.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcomes were mobility survey scores and mean timed Up and Go duration.
RESULTS: Most participants reported significant ease of completing basic indoor ambulation and toileting tasks (66%-75%) and significant difficulty in running or prolonged ambulation activities (83%) requiring use of lower limb prosthesis. Timed Up and Go test was faster (11.0±2.9 s) than the reference range for transtibial prosthesis users and negatively associated with self-reported lower extremity functional status (r=-.70, P=.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported movement with lower limb prostheses at home and evaluation of mobility via a virtual platform is a feasible assessment modality that may reduce the frequency of therapy visits, defray some rehabilitation costs, and minimize the travel burden to distant prosthetic clinics.
DESIGN: Descriptive observational study using a clinician-administered functional mobility survey and timed Up and Go test to assess lower extremity function under supervision.
SETTING: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant online virtual platform.
PARTICIPANTS: Twelve lower limb loss clients currently using prostheses, aged ≥19 years, not pregnant, and with no stroke, seizure disorder, or cancer.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcomes were mobility survey scores and mean timed Up and Go duration.
RESULTS: Most participants reported significant ease of completing basic indoor ambulation and toileting tasks (66%-75%) and significant difficulty in running or prolonged ambulation activities (83%) requiring use of lower limb prosthesis. Timed Up and Go test was faster (11.0±2.9 s) than the reference range for transtibial prosthesis users and negatively associated with self-reported lower extremity functional status (r=-.70, P=.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported movement with lower limb prostheses at home and evaluation of mobility via a virtual platform is a feasible assessment modality that may reduce the frequency of therapy visits, defray some rehabilitation costs, and minimize the travel burden to distant prosthetic clinics.