m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of strength and conditioning research · 2024

Ventilatory and Perceived Ergogenic Effects of Mandibular Forward Repositioning During Running at Maximal Oxygen Uptake Intensity.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Cardoso Filipa, Costa Mário J, Colaço Paulo, Vilas-Boas João Paulo, Pinho João C, Pyne David B, Fernandes Ricardo J

Аннотация

Cardoso, F, Costa, MJ, Colaço, P, Vilas-Boas, JP, Pinho, JC, Pyne, DB, and Fernandes, RJ. Ventilatory and perceived ergogenic effects of mandibular forward repositioning during running at maximal oxygen uptake intensity. J Strength Cond Res 39(1): e13-e19, 2025-Wearing an intraoral dental splint may enhance ventilatory function and exercise performance. Nineteen runners performed on a 400-m outdoor track: (a) an incremental protocol to assess the velocity at maximal oxygen uptake (vV̇ o2 max) and (b) 2 square wave bouts wearing 2 intraoral splints (with and without mandibular forward repositioning). The time until exhaustion at vV̇ o2 max (TLimv V̇ o2 max), ventilatory variables, oxygen uptake (V̇ o2 ) kinetics, energetic profiling, perceived exertion and kinematics, were all measured. Ventilatory data were assessed breath-by-breath and perceived exertion evaluated using the Borg 6-20-point scale at the end of TLimv V̇ o2 max bouts. Images were recorded by video cameras (120 Hz) and kinematic measures retrieved using Kinovea. A paired t test was computed for comparison of splints ( p ≤ 0.05). With (vs. without) mandibular forward repositioning, runners increased their TLimv V̇ o2 max by ∼6% ( p = 0.03), coupled with higher ventilation (151 ± 22 vs. 147 ± 23 L·min -1 , p = 0.04), end-tidal oxygen tension (114.3 ± 3.7 vs. 112.9 ± 3.9 mm Hg, p = 0.003), and lower inspiratory time (0.526 ± 0.083 vs. 0.540 ± 0.090 seconds, p = 0.02), despite similar V̇ o2 kinetics (e.g., 49.0 ± 8.7 vs. 47.7 ± 8.6 ml∙kg∙min -1 of fast component amplitude) being observed. The energy expenditure was ∼8% higher ( p = 0.03) with the mandible forward, coupled with lower perceived exertion scores ( p = 0.04). Mandibular forward repositioning was effective in acutely improving running performance at vV̇ o2 max with ergogenic effects on ventilatory and perceived variables.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты