MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/17453674.2011.584211

Медицинская библиотека · Acta orthopaedica · 2011

Fast-track revision knee arthroplasty. A feasibility study.

Husted Henrik, Otte Kristian S, Kristensen Billy B, Kehlet Henrik

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fast-track surgery has reduced the length of hospital stay (LOS), morbidity, and convalescence in primary hip and knee arthroplasty (TKA). We assessed whether patients undergoing revision TKA for non-septic indications might also benefit from fast-track surgery.

METHODS

29 patients were operated with 30 revision arthroplasties. Median age was 67 (34-84) years. All patients followed a standardized fast-track set-up designed for primary TKA. We determined the outcome regarding LOS, morbidity, mortality, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Median LOS was 2 (1-4) days excluding 1 patient, who was transferred to another hospital for logistical reasons (10 days). None of the patients died within 3 months, and 3 patients were re-admitted (2 for suspicion of DVT, which was not found, and 1 for joint mobilization). Patient satisfaction was high.

INTERPRETATION: Patients undergoing revision TKA for non-septic reasons may be included in fast-track protocols. Outcome appears to be similar to that of primary TKA regarding LOS, morbidity, and satisfaction. Our findings call for larger confirmatory studies and studies involving other indications (revision THA, 1-stage septic revisions).

Для цитирования: Husted Henrik, Otte Kristian S, Kristensen Billy B, Kehlet Henrik. Fast-track revision knee arthroplasty. A feasibility study.. Acta orthopaedica. 2011. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2011.584211.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.