International journal of sports physiology and performance · 2024
The Effect of Water Dousing on Heat Strain and Performance During Endurance Running in the Heat.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Anderson Mitchell, Bellenger Clint, Chaseling Georgia K, Chalmers Samuel
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Assess the effect of water dousing on heat strain and performance during self- and fixed-paced exercise in the heat.
DESIGN: Crossover, block-randomized controlled trial.
METHODS: Thirteen trained runners completed a 10-km time trial (TT) and 60-minute fixed-pace run (60% velocity of V˙O2max) in a 30.4 °C, 47.4% relative humidity environment using either water dousing (DOUSE) or no dousing (CON).
RESULTS: Ten-kilometer TT performance was faster in DOUSE compared to CON (44:11 [40:48, 47:34] vs 44:38 [41:21, 47:56] min:s; P = .033). Change in core temperature (Tc) was not different between groups during the TT (+0.02 [-0.04, 0.07] °C in DOUSE; P = .853) or fixed-pace run (+0.02 [-0.15, 0.18] °C; P = .848). Change in mean skin temperature was lower in DOUSE during the TT (-1.80 [-2.15, -1.46] °C; P < .001) and fixed-pace run (-1.38 [-1.81, -0.96] °C; P < .001). Heart rate was lower for DOUSE during the fixed-pace run (-3.5 [-6.8, -0.2] beats/min; P = .041) but not during the TT (-0.2 [-2.5, 2.1] beats/min; P = .853). Thermal sensation was lower for DOUSE during the TT (-49.3 [-72.1, -26.1] mm; P < .001) and fixed-pace run (-44.7 [-59.7, -29.6] mm; P < .001). Rating of perceived exertion was not different between groups for the TT (-0.2 [-0.7, 0.3]; P = .390) or fixed-pace run (-0.2 [-0.8, 0.4]; P = .480). Sweat rate was lower for DOUSE for the TT (-0.37 [-0.53, -0.22] L/h; P < .001) and fixed-pace run (-0.37 [-0.48, -0.26] L/h; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Water dousing improves 10-km TT performance in the heat but does not affect Tc. The positive change in thermal perception (via lower skin temperature) during the TT likely drives this benefit.
DESIGN: Crossover, block-randomized controlled trial.
METHODS: Thirteen trained runners completed a 10-km time trial (TT) and 60-minute fixed-pace run (60% velocity of V˙O2max) in a 30.4 °C, 47.4% relative humidity environment using either water dousing (DOUSE) or no dousing (CON).
RESULTS: Ten-kilometer TT performance was faster in DOUSE compared to CON (44:11 [40:48, 47:34] vs 44:38 [41:21, 47:56] min:s; P = .033). Change in core temperature (Tc) was not different between groups during the TT (+0.02 [-0.04, 0.07] °C in DOUSE; P = .853) or fixed-pace run (+0.02 [-0.15, 0.18] °C; P = .848). Change in mean skin temperature was lower in DOUSE during the TT (-1.80 [-2.15, -1.46] °C; P < .001) and fixed-pace run (-1.38 [-1.81, -0.96] °C; P < .001). Heart rate was lower for DOUSE during the fixed-pace run (-3.5 [-6.8, -0.2] beats/min; P = .041) but not during the TT (-0.2 [-2.5, 2.1] beats/min; P = .853). Thermal sensation was lower for DOUSE during the TT (-49.3 [-72.1, -26.1] mm; P < .001) and fixed-pace run (-44.7 [-59.7, -29.6] mm; P < .001). Rating of perceived exertion was not different between groups for the TT (-0.2 [-0.7, 0.3]; P = .390) or fixed-pace run (-0.2 [-0.8, 0.4]; P = .480). Sweat rate was lower for DOUSE for the TT (-0.37 [-0.53, -0.22] L/h; P < .001) and fixed-pace run (-0.37 [-0.48, -0.26] L/h; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Water dousing improves 10-km TT performance in the heat but does not affect Tc. The positive change in thermal perception (via lower skin temperature) during the TT likely drives this benefit.