The Knee · 2024
The effects of core muscle fatigue on lower limbs and trunk during single-leg drop landing: A comparison between recreational runners with and without dynamic knee valgus.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Curi Gina Olívia Brigido da Costa, Costa Franciele Dias da, Medeiros Victor de Souza, Barbosa Vinícius Dias, Santos Thiago Ribeiro Teles, Dionisio Valdeci Carlos
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A deficit in neuromuscular trunk control can impact the lower limb motion, predisposing runners to injuries. This deficit may show a greater impact on runners with dynamic knee valgus. This study aimed to compare the effect of core fatigue on kinetic, kinematic, and electromyographic parameters of the trunk and lower limbs during single-leg drop landing between runners with and without dynamic knee valgus.
METHODS: Twenty-seven recreational runners were allocated to the valgus (n = 14) and non-valgus groups (n = 13). They performed the test before and after a fatigue protocol, taking a step forward and landing on the force platform while maintaining balance. The fatigue protocol included isometric and dynamic exercises performed consecutively until voluntary exhaustion. The vertical ground reaction force, the sagittal and frontal plane angles, and the electromyographic activity were evaluated. The integral of electromyographic activity was calculated into three movement phases. ANOVA with repeated measures was used to verify the group, time, and interaction effects.
RESULTS: After fatigue, both groups showed a significant reduction in the minimum (p = 0.01) and maximum (p = 0.02) knee angles in the frontal plane (more dynamic knee valgus) and greater gluteus medius activity (p = 0.05) from the peak of knee flexion to the end of the movement. The valgus group had a greater hip excursion (p = 0.01) and vertical linear shoulder displacement (p = 0.02) than the non-valgus.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that core fatigue can impact the local muscle and the distal joint and that the groups presented different strategies to deal with the demand during landing.
METHODS: Twenty-seven recreational runners were allocated to the valgus (n = 14) and non-valgus groups (n = 13). They performed the test before and after a fatigue protocol, taking a step forward and landing on the force platform while maintaining balance. The fatigue protocol included isometric and dynamic exercises performed consecutively until voluntary exhaustion. The vertical ground reaction force, the sagittal and frontal plane angles, and the electromyographic activity were evaluated. The integral of electromyographic activity was calculated into three movement phases. ANOVA with repeated measures was used to verify the group, time, and interaction effects.
RESULTS: After fatigue, both groups showed a significant reduction in the minimum (p = 0.01) and maximum (p = 0.02) knee angles in the frontal plane (more dynamic knee valgus) and greater gluteus medius activity (p = 0.05) from the peak of knee flexion to the end of the movement. The valgus group had a greater hip excursion (p = 0.01) and vertical linear shoulder displacement (p = 0.02) than the non-valgus.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that core fatigue can impact the local muscle and the distal joint and that the groups presented different strategies to deal with the demand during landing.