Latest possible timing for endoscopic-assisted intervention in capsule endoscopy.

BACKGROUND

Delayed upper gastrointestinal transit during small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) can lead to incomplete or failed examinations but can be treated by endoscopic-assisted intervention (EAI). The aim of this study was to investigate the latest possible timing of EAI.

METHODS

Patients who underwent SBCE and received EAI between July 2007 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A novel T-value was developed that accounted for the varied battery life of different generations of PillCam when determining the latest possible timing of EAI, where T is calculated as EAI time/[minimum battery life of the PillCam minus small bowel transit time (6 h)] × 100%. Patients were divided into two groups based on the cut-off value of the receiver operating characteristic curve: early EAI (group A, T < 76.3%) and late EAI (group B, T ≥ 76.3%). The primary outcome was the completion rate (CR), and the secondary outcome was the detection rate. The latest possible timing of EAI (h) was calculated according to the T-value formula and further verified in our recent data set.

RESULTS

This study included 108 patients. The CR was significantly higher in group A than in group B (79.2% vs 58.2%; P = 0.018). Late EAI was an independent predictor of incomplete SBCE (odds ratio = 2.900; 95% confidence interval, 1.193-7.053). The latest possible timing of EAI was 1.5 h and 4.6 h from the start of the examination for PillCam SB1 and PillCam SB2/3, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Early EAI was associated with higher CR. The latest possible timing of EAI was 1.5 h for PillCam SB1 and 4.6 h for PillCam SB2/3 from the start of the examination.