European journal of applied physiology · 2024
A modified step-ramp-step protocol to prescribe constant-speed exercise in treadmill running.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Faricier Robin, Micheli Lorenzo, Guluzade Nasimi A, Murias Juan M, Keir Daniel A
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study investigated whether a running-adapted version of the cycling-based "step-ramp-step" (SRS) protocol would improve prediction of V ˙ O2 in treadmill exercise compared to the traditional prescriptive approach.
METHODS: Fourteen healthy individuals (6 females; 25 ± 6 years; 66.1 ± 12.7 kg) performed a treadmill-based SRS protocol including a ramp-incremental test to task failure followed by two constant-speed bouts within the moderate-(MODstep-below estimated lactate threshold; θLT), and heavy-intensity domains (HVYstep-between θLT and respiratory compensation point; RCP). Using the uncorrected V ˙ O2-to-speed relationship from the ramp exercise, three constant-speed bouts were performed at 40-50% between: baseline and θLT (CSEMOD); θLT and RCP (CSEHVY); and RCP and peak (CSESEV). For CSEMOD, CSEHVY, and CSESEV measured end-exercise V ˙ O2 was compared to predicted V ˙ O2 based on the: (i) "SRS-corrected" V ˙ O2-to-speed relationship (where MODstep and HVYstep were used to adjust the V ˙ O2 relative to speed); and (ii) linear "uncorrected" data.
RESULTS: Average treadmill speeds for CSEMOD and CSEHVY were 7.8 ± 0.8 and 11.0 ± 1.4 km·h-1, respectively, eliciting end-exercise V ˙ O2 of 1979 ± 390 and 2574 ± 540 mL·min-1. End-exercise V ˙ O2 values were not different compared to SRS-predicted V ˙ O2 at CSEMOD (mean difference: 5 ± 166 mL·min-1; p = 0.912) and CSEHVY (20 ± 128 mL·min-1; p = 0.568). The linear "uncorrected" estimates were not different for CSEMOD (- 91 ± 172 mL·min-1; p = 0.068) but lower for CSEHVY (- 195 ± 146 mL·min-1; p < 0.001). For CSESEV (running speed: 13.8 ± 1.7 km·h-1), the end-exercise V ˙ O2 was not different from peak V ˙ O2 achieved during the ramp (3027 ± 682 vs. 2979 ± 655 mL·min-1; p = 0.231).
CONCLUSION: In healthy individuals, the SRS protocol more accurately predicts speeds for a target V ˙ O2 compared to traditional approaches.
METHODS: Fourteen healthy individuals (6 females; 25 ± 6 years; 66.1 ± 12.7 kg) performed a treadmill-based SRS protocol including a ramp-incremental test to task failure followed by two constant-speed bouts within the moderate-(MODstep-below estimated lactate threshold; θLT), and heavy-intensity domains (HVYstep-between θLT and respiratory compensation point; RCP). Using the uncorrected V ˙ O2-to-speed relationship from the ramp exercise, three constant-speed bouts were performed at 40-50% between: baseline and θLT (CSEMOD); θLT and RCP (CSEHVY); and RCP and peak (CSESEV). For CSEMOD, CSEHVY, and CSESEV measured end-exercise V ˙ O2 was compared to predicted V ˙ O2 based on the: (i) "SRS-corrected" V ˙ O2-to-speed relationship (where MODstep and HVYstep were used to adjust the V ˙ O2 relative to speed); and (ii) linear "uncorrected" data.
RESULTS: Average treadmill speeds for CSEMOD and CSEHVY were 7.8 ± 0.8 and 11.0 ± 1.4 km·h-1, respectively, eliciting end-exercise V ˙ O2 of 1979 ± 390 and 2574 ± 540 mL·min-1. End-exercise V ˙ O2 values were not different compared to SRS-predicted V ˙ O2 at CSEMOD (mean difference: 5 ± 166 mL·min-1; p = 0.912) and CSEHVY (20 ± 128 mL·min-1; p = 0.568). The linear "uncorrected" estimates were not different for CSEMOD (- 91 ± 172 mL·min-1; p = 0.068) but lower for CSEHVY (- 195 ± 146 mL·min-1; p < 0.001). For CSESEV (running speed: 13.8 ± 1.7 km·h-1), the end-exercise V ˙ O2 was not different from peak V ˙ O2 achieved during the ramp (3027 ± 682 vs. 2979 ± 655 mL·min-1; p = 0.231).
CONCLUSION: In healthy individuals, the SRS protocol more accurately predicts speeds for a target V ˙ O2 compared to traditional approaches.