MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/dmp.2015.103

Медицинская библиотека · Disaster medicine and public health preparedness · 2015

Ebola Preparedness Planning and Collaboration by Two Health Systems in Wisconsin, September to December 2014.

Leonhardt Kathryn Kraft, Keuler Megan, Safdar Nasia, Hunter Paul

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We describe the collaborative approach used by 2 health systems in Wisconsin to plan and prepare for the threat of Ebola virus disease. This was a descriptive study of the preparedness planning, infection prevention, and collaboration with public health agencies undertaken by 2 health systems in Wisconsin between September and December 2014. The preparedness approach used by the 2 health systems relied successfully on their robust infrastructure for planning and infection prevention. In the setting of rapidly evolving guidance and unprecedented fear regarding Ebola, the 2 health systems enhanced their response through collaboration and coordination with each other and government public health agencies. Key lessons learned included the importance of a rigorous planning process, robust infection prevention practices, and coalitions between public and private health sectors. The potential threat of Ebola virus disease stimulated emergency preparedness in which acute care facilities played a leading role in the public health response. Leveraging the existing expertise of health systems is essential when faced with emerging infectious diseases. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2016;10:691-697).

Для цитирования: Leonhardt Kathryn Kraft, Keuler Megan, Safdar Nasia, Hunter Paul. Ebola Preparedness Planning and Collaboration by Two Health Systems in Wisconsin, September to December 2014.. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness. 2015. DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2015.103.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.