BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2024
No beneficial effect of aerobic whole-body electromyostimulation on lower limbs strength and power - a randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Krause Anne, Centner Christoph, Walther Moritz, Memmert Daniel, Walser Nicolas, Ritzmann Ramona
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Applying whole-body electromyostimulation (wbEMS) to voluntary activation of the muscle is known to impact motor unit recruitment. Thus, wbEMS as an additional training stimulus enhances force-related capacities. This study aimed to evaluate the mono- and multiarticular strength adaptations to a running intervention with wbEMS compared to running without wbEMS.
METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial (RCT), 59 healthy participants (32 female/ 27 male, 41 ± 7 years) with minor running experience conducted an eight-week running intervention (2x/ week à 20 min) with a wbEMS suit (EG) or without wbEMS (control group, CG). Maximal isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength and jump height during countermovement jumps were recorded prior and after the intervention to assess maximal strength and power.
RESULTS: Following eight weeks of running, maximal isokinetic knee extension torque decreased significantly over time for both interventions (EG Δ -4%, CG Δ -4%; F(1, 44.14) = 5.96, p = 0.02, η = 0.12). No changes were observed for flexion torque (F(1, 43.20) = 3.93, p = 0.05, η = 0.08) or jump height (F(1, 43.04) = 0.32, p = 0.57, η = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes indicate that there is no additional effect over neuromuscular function adaptations with the inclusion of wbEMS during running training. Knee extensor strength is even slightly reduced which supports the principle of training specificity in regards to strength adaptation. We conclude that strength improvements cannot be achieved by running with wbEMS.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, ID DRKS00026827, date 10/26/21.
METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial (RCT), 59 healthy participants (32 female/ 27 male, 41 ± 7 years) with minor running experience conducted an eight-week running intervention (2x/ week à 20 min) with a wbEMS suit (EG) or without wbEMS (control group, CG). Maximal isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength and jump height during countermovement jumps were recorded prior and after the intervention to assess maximal strength and power.
RESULTS: Following eight weeks of running, maximal isokinetic knee extension torque decreased significantly over time for both interventions (EG Δ -4%, CG Δ -4%; F(1, 44.14) = 5.96, p = 0.02, η = 0.12). No changes were observed for flexion torque (F(1, 43.20) = 3.93, p = 0.05, η = 0.08) or jump height (F(1, 43.04) = 0.32, p = 0.57, η = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes indicate that there is no additional effect over neuromuscular function adaptations with the inclusion of wbEMS during running training. Knee extensor strength is even slightly reduced which supports the principle of training specificity in regards to strength adaptation. We conclude that strength improvements cannot be achieved by running with wbEMS.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, ID DRKS00026827, date 10/26/21.