Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2019
Influence of scan mode (partial/full rotations) and FOV size in the formation of artefacts in cone beam CT.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Costa Eliana Dantas da, Queiroz Polyane Mazucatto, Santaella Gustavo Machado, Capelozza Ana Lúcia Alvares, Ambrosano Glaucia Maria Bovi, Freitas Deborah Queiroz
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of rotation degree and field of view (FOV) size on the amount of artefacts produced in cone beam CT (CBCT) images.
METHODS: A cylindrical wax utility phantom, with a metallic sample in its interior, was scanned with two FOV sizes (100 x 100 and 40 x 40 mm) and in full (360°) and partial (~180°) rotations. After the acquisitions, images were objectively assessed in the ImageJ software, obtaining the standard deviation in areas around the metal sample. The influence of artefacts produced by the several FOVs and rotation degrees was compared by two-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: The images obtained with a large FOV presented a higher amount of noise compared to a restricted FOV, both for partial (p = 0.0037) and full (p = 0.0023) rotation degrees. For images obtained with a restricted FOV, full rotation resulted in images with less noise (p = 0.0259). For images obtained with large FOV, there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.1494) in noise for both rotation protocols.
CONCLUSIONS: As there were no significant differences in the amount of artefacts in rotation protocols for large FOVs, the partial rotation can be indicated due to its lower exposure to radiation. For acquiring images with restricted FOVs, the full rotation is recommended.
METHODS: A cylindrical wax utility phantom, with a metallic sample in its interior, was scanned with two FOV sizes (100 x 100 and 40 x 40 mm) and in full (360°) and partial (~180°) rotations. After the acquisitions, images were objectively assessed in the ImageJ software, obtaining the standard deviation in areas around the metal sample. The influence of artefacts produced by the several FOVs and rotation degrees was compared by two-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: The images obtained with a large FOV presented a higher amount of noise compared to a restricted FOV, both for partial (p = 0.0037) and full (p = 0.0023) rotation degrees. For images obtained with a restricted FOV, full rotation resulted in images with less noise (p = 0.0259). For images obtained with large FOV, there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.1494) in noise for both rotation protocols.
CONCLUSIONS: As there were no significant differences in the amount of artefacts in rotation protocols for large FOVs, the partial rotation can be indicated due to its lower exposure to radiation. For acquiring images with restricted FOVs, the full rotation is recommended.