Morphologie : bulletin de l'Association des anatomistes · 2023
Methods and outcomes of teaching functional anatomy of the musculoskeletal system: A scoping review.
СтатьяScoping ReviewНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chytas D, Piagkou M, Tsakotos G, Protogerou V, Demesticha T, Natsis K
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Although musculoskeletal anatomy is inherently related to motion, there is a lack of evidence review about the best teaching practices for the locomotor apparatus functional anatomy. We aimed to detect the strategies that have been implemented for functional musculoskeletal anatomy education, and their outcomes, with the ultimate purpose of suggesting the most effective teaching methods.
METHODS: The databases PubMed, Scopus, ERIC, and Cochrane Library were searched for papers with the purpose of exploring the outcomes (participants' perceptions and/or examination performance) of teaching functional musculoskeletal anatomy. From each study, the following information was extracted: author(s), number of participants, implementation method, participants' perceptions and/or examination performance after the educational intervention, and classification of the outcomes according to the Kirkpatrick hierarchy.
RESULTS: Seven papers were included. Six of them involved active learning strategies (other than seeing, listening, and taking notes). Several specific teaching methods were implemented, including physical activities, lectures, textbooks, atlases, prosected specimens, near-peer teaching, and digital and physical models. Overall, methods that involved active learning, especially some form of physical activity, had the best educational outcomes, while passive learning was not found to be significantly more effective in any case. The role of modern anatomy education technologies has been inadequately explored.
CONCLUSIONS: It appears that teaching functional musculoskeletal anatomy is more successful when using active learning methods, especially involving some form of physical activity. More research is necessary to determine the best environment for these methods and investigate the role of modern technologies in functional musculoskeletal anatomy education.
METHODS: The databases PubMed, Scopus, ERIC, and Cochrane Library were searched for papers with the purpose of exploring the outcomes (participants' perceptions and/or examination performance) of teaching functional musculoskeletal anatomy. From each study, the following information was extracted: author(s), number of participants, implementation method, participants' perceptions and/or examination performance after the educational intervention, and classification of the outcomes according to the Kirkpatrick hierarchy.
RESULTS: Seven papers were included. Six of them involved active learning strategies (other than seeing, listening, and taking notes). Several specific teaching methods were implemented, including physical activities, lectures, textbooks, atlases, prosected specimens, near-peer teaching, and digital and physical models. Overall, methods that involved active learning, especially some form of physical activity, had the best educational outcomes, while passive learning was not found to be significantly more effective in any case. The role of modern anatomy education technologies has been inadequately explored.
CONCLUSIONS: It appears that teaching functional musculoskeletal anatomy is more successful when using active learning methods, especially involving some form of physical activity. More research is necessary to determine the best environment for these methods and investigate the role of modern technologies in functional musculoskeletal anatomy education.