MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1123/jpah.6.3.386

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of physical activity & health · 2009

Priority of activity-friendly community issues among key decision makers in Hawaii.

Maddock Jay E, Reger-Nash Bill, Heinrich Katie, Leyden Kevin M, Bias Thomas K

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The U.S. Community Guide to Preventive Services strongly recommends changes in urban design, land use, and accessibility to increase physical activity. To achieve these goals, policy change is often needed. This study assessed attitudes of decision makers in Hawaii to determine if physical activity-related issues are among their priorities.

METHODS

State and county officials (n = 179) were mailed surveys. Respondents listed the three most important problems (open-ended) in Hawaii and rated the importance of 23 specified problems, of which six directly related to physical activity.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 126 (70.4%) respondents. The most frequently mentioned categories for the open-ended questions were affordable housing, environment/sustainability, sprawl/traffic/population growth, and healthcare. Among the closed-ended physical activity related items, increasing traffic was ranked highest (43.9%) and fourth overall. Less than 12% of decision makers rated other physical activity issues as important.

CONCLUSIONS

Future work is needed to increase the visibility and importance of physical activity related issues among policymakers.

Для цитирования: Maddock Jay E, Reger-Nash Bill, Heinrich Katie, Leyden Kevin M, Bias Thomas K. Priority of activity-friendly community issues among key decision makers in Hawaii.. Journal of physical activity & health. 2009. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.6.3.386.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.