Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
Effective healthcare coverage in Canada: The caring and responding in Edmonton project.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zakkar Moutasem A, Deck Sarah, Jang Se Lim, Kolahdooz Fariba, Wagg Adrian, Corriveau André, Sharma Sangita
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Despite the progress towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in Canada, individuals experiencing socioeconomic disadvantages continue to face barriers to accessing necessary health services. This study explored the observational insights of social care providers (SCPs), who regularly engage with vulnerable populations and healthcare systems, to better understand these barriers in Edmonton, Canada.
METHODS: A qualitative descriptive design was employed, guided by COREQ criteria. Purposive sampling recruited SCPs from 22 community organizations serving Indigenous community members and people experiencing homelessness, substance use, and immigration-related challenges. Deductive thematic analysis, structured around the Effective Coverage (EC) framework, was used to analyze interview data. A coding framework was developed a priori, and inductive coding identified interpretive themes within each EC category.
RESULTS: Sixty-five SCPs participated. Findings were organized into four EC categories: service availability, accessibility, acceptability, and utilization. Within these, ten themes were identified: insufficient service capacity, restrictive access policies, service denial, unaffordable care, transportation barriers, racism, stigma, patient-related deterrents to seeking care, language barriers, and barriers to navigating the healthcare system. These themes illustrate how institutional policies, resource limitations, and communication challenges intersect with socioeconomic disadvantages to hinder access to and quality of care. SCPs also described how their organizations often intervene to help clients overcome these barriers.
CONCLUSION: SCPs can provide valuable observational insights into healthcare access barriers. While these perspectives do not represent direct patient accounts, they offer critical input for designing policy interventions to improve UHC. Applying the EC framework may enhance equity and support continuous quality improvement.
METHODS: A qualitative descriptive design was employed, guided by COREQ criteria. Purposive sampling recruited SCPs from 22 community organizations serving Indigenous community members and people experiencing homelessness, substance use, and immigration-related challenges. Deductive thematic analysis, structured around the Effective Coverage (EC) framework, was used to analyze interview data. A coding framework was developed a priori, and inductive coding identified interpretive themes within each EC category.
RESULTS: Sixty-five SCPs participated. Findings were organized into four EC categories: service availability, accessibility, acceptability, and utilization. Within these, ten themes were identified: insufficient service capacity, restrictive access policies, service denial, unaffordable care, transportation barriers, racism, stigma, patient-related deterrents to seeking care, language barriers, and barriers to navigating the healthcare system. These themes illustrate how institutional policies, resource limitations, and communication challenges intersect with socioeconomic disadvantages to hinder access to and quality of care. SCPs also described how their organizations often intervene to help clients overcome these barriers.
CONCLUSION: SCPs can provide valuable observational insights into healthcare access barriers. While these perspectives do not represent direct patient accounts, they offer critical input for designing policy interventions to improve UHC. Applying the EC framework may enhance equity and support continuous quality improvement.