Frontiers in public health · 2025
Diabetes care for people experiencing homelessness in the UK: insights from a national survey of frontline professionals and the development of an integrated care model.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oehring Daniela, Paisi Martha, Nasser Mona, Jackson Theo, Young Ryan, Wooff Lynne, Partridge Helen, Conaty Jacqueline, Dorney-Smith Samantha
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: People experiencing homelessness (PEH) face food insecurity, unstable housing and fragmented services that render conventional diabetes pathways unworkable and amplify complications.
METHODS: Between January and April 2024, we conducted a nationwide, cross-sectional mixed-methods survey of front-line professionals via NHS, inclusion-health and voluntary-sector networks, analysing quantitative data (n = 104) with ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis tests and ordinal logistic regression, and subjecting free-text responses to reflexive thematic analysis, before converging findings to develop the Integrated Holistic Diabetes Care Model for Homelessness (IHD-CMPH).
RESULTS: Respondents comprised specialist diabetes clinicians (31%), homelessness/inclusion-health staff (38%) and VCSE providers (32%); median perceived Type 1 prevalence among PEH was 20% versus 8% nationally (p < 0.001). Fifty-seven per cent rated diabetes outcomes for PEH as poor or very poor, and 66% reported more frequent amputations and vision loss. Clear organisational policies (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.06-2.48), cross-sector collaboration (OR 2.76, 1.20-6.36) and outreach-specific training (OR 2.50, 1.50-4.17) were independently associated with better outcomes. Thematic analysis highlighted service fragmentation, inflexible appointments and insufficient homelessness-specific education.
DISCUSSION: Diabetes inequities among PEH stem chiefly from modifiable structural failures rather than patient non-adherence. The novel IHD-CMPH, anchored in outreach and mobile screening, provides a scalable framework to operationalise inclusion-health policy, improve glycaemic surveillance and avert avoidable admissions; this first national study translating multi-sector front-line evidence into a coherent policy model offers concrete levers for health-system reform and equity advancement.
METHODS: Between January and April 2024, we conducted a nationwide, cross-sectional mixed-methods survey of front-line professionals via NHS, inclusion-health and voluntary-sector networks, analysing quantitative data (n = 104) with ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis tests and ordinal logistic regression, and subjecting free-text responses to reflexive thematic analysis, before converging findings to develop the Integrated Holistic Diabetes Care Model for Homelessness (IHD-CMPH).
RESULTS: Respondents comprised specialist diabetes clinicians (31%), homelessness/inclusion-health staff (38%) and VCSE providers (32%); median perceived Type 1 prevalence among PEH was 20% versus 8% nationally (p < 0.001). Fifty-seven per cent rated diabetes outcomes for PEH as poor or very poor, and 66% reported more frequent amputations and vision loss. Clear organisational policies (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.06-2.48), cross-sector collaboration (OR 2.76, 1.20-6.36) and outreach-specific training (OR 2.50, 1.50-4.17) were independently associated with better outcomes. Thematic analysis highlighted service fragmentation, inflexible appointments and insufficient homelessness-specific education.
DISCUSSION: Diabetes inequities among PEH stem chiefly from modifiable structural failures rather than patient non-adherence. The novel IHD-CMPH, anchored in outreach and mobile screening, provides a scalable framework to operationalise inclusion-health policy, improve glycaemic surveillance and avert avoidable admissions; this first national study translating multi-sector front-line evidence into a coherent policy model offers concrete levers for health-system reform and equity advancement.