Explore (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
Using What Matters Most to improve health care delivery for individuals and populations of veterans experiencing homelessness and substance use disorders.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Flike Kimberlee, Naughton Elizabeth, Bouchard-Bihr Rosalie, Tague Abigail, Willwerth Gretchen, Nault Matthew, Hyde Justeen
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To understand ways in which the Personal Health Inventory (PHI), a tool to prompt reflection on what matters most and status in 8 components of health and well-being, can be used to inform care of homeless veterans entering a Mental Health Residential Rehabilitation Treatment Program, at individual and programmatic levels.
METHODS: Mixed method study was conducted at one residential treatment program. Quantitative data was collected from the PHI (n=64) and was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data was collected from the PHI and semi-structured staff interviews (n=9) and was analyzed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Approximately half of veterans entering the program between January and September, 2023 completed a PHI. Themes for what matters most included: 1) reconnecting with family, 2) improving health, and 3) self-discovery. Structured responses to the 8 areas of health indicated lowest satisfaction with: 1) relationships, 2) personal development, and 3) surroundings. Staff interviews indicated knowing where veterans are most and least satisfied helped inform goal setting and connection to resources. Population-level analysis of information from the PHI prompted reflection on existing programming.
CONCLUSIONS: Residential treatment programs may benefit from incorporating brief instruments like the PHI to inform individual care and overall program offerings.
METHODS: Mixed method study was conducted at one residential treatment program. Quantitative data was collected from the PHI (n=64) and was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data was collected from the PHI and semi-structured staff interviews (n=9) and was analyzed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Approximately half of veterans entering the program between January and September, 2023 completed a PHI. Themes for what matters most included: 1) reconnecting with family, 2) improving health, and 3) self-discovery. Structured responses to the 8 areas of health indicated lowest satisfaction with: 1) relationships, 2) personal development, and 3) surroundings. Staff interviews indicated knowing where veterans are most and least satisfied helped inform goal setting and connection to resources. Population-level analysis of information from the PHI prompted reflection on existing programming.
CONCLUSIONS: Residential treatment programs may benefit from incorporating brief instruments like the PHI to inform individual care and overall program offerings.