Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
BioInstruct: instruction tuning of large language models for biomedical natural language processing.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tran Hieu, Yang Zhichao, Yao Zonghai, Yu Hong
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs) in biomedical natural language processing (BioNLP) by introducing a domain-specific instruction dataset and examining its impact when combined with multi-task learning principles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We created the BioInstruct, comprising 25 005 instructions to instruction-tune LLMs (LLaMA 1 and 2, 7B and 13B version). The instructions were created by prompting the GPT-4 language model with 3-seed samples randomly drawn from an 80 human curated instructions. We employed Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) for parameter-efficient fine-tuning. We then evaluated these instruction-tuned LLMs on several BioNLP tasks, which can be grouped into 3 major categories: question answering (QA), information extraction (IE), and text generation (GEN). We also examined whether categories (eg, QA, IE, and generation) of instructions impact model performance.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Comparing with LLMs without instruction-tuned, our instruction-tuned LLMs demonstrated marked performance gains: 17.3% in QA on average accuracy metric, 5.7% in IE on average F1 metric, and 96% in Generation tasks on average GPT-4 score metric. Our 7B-parameter instruction-tuned LLaMA 1 model was competitive or even surpassed other LLMs in the biomedical domain that were also fine-tuned from LLaMA 1 with vast domain-specific data or a variety of tasks. Our results also show that the performance gain is significantly higher when instruction fine-tuning is conducted with closely related tasks. Our findings align with the observations of multi-task learning, suggesting the synergies between 2 tasks.
CONCLUSION: The BioInstruct dataset serves as a valuable resource and instruction tuned LLMs lead to the best performing BioNLP applications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We created the BioInstruct, comprising 25 005 instructions to instruction-tune LLMs (LLaMA 1 and 2, 7B and 13B version). The instructions were created by prompting the GPT-4 language model with 3-seed samples randomly drawn from an 80 human curated instructions. We employed Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) for parameter-efficient fine-tuning. We then evaluated these instruction-tuned LLMs on several BioNLP tasks, which can be grouped into 3 major categories: question answering (QA), information extraction (IE), and text generation (GEN). We also examined whether categories (eg, QA, IE, and generation) of instructions impact model performance.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Comparing with LLMs without instruction-tuned, our instruction-tuned LLMs demonstrated marked performance gains: 17.3% in QA on average accuracy metric, 5.7% in IE on average F1 metric, and 96% in Generation tasks on average GPT-4 score metric. Our 7B-parameter instruction-tuned LLaMA 1 model was competitive or even surpassed other LLMs in the biomedical domain that were also fine-tuned from LLaMA 1 with vast domain-specific data or a variety of tasks. Our results also show that the performance gain is significantly higher when instruction fine-tuning is conducted with closely related tasks. Our findings align with the observations of multi-task learning, suggesting the synergies between 2 tasks.
CONCLUSION: The BioInstruct dataset serves as a valuable resource and instruction tuned LLMs lead to the best performing BioNLP applications.