Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2022
Addressing hygiene needs of housing insecure populations: A qualitative analysis of Seattle and King County's mobile hygiene station intervention.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Marshall Arisa, Dugan Jerome A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Seattle Public Utility mobile hygiene station program, a program deployed using public funds in response to the large-scale closures of public hygiene facilities due to COVID-19.
STUDY DESIGN: We conduct a qualitative analysis using semi-structured interviews.
METHODS: We interviewed four Seattle Public Utility (SPU) and Public Health Seattle & King County (PHSKC) employees involved in the design, deployment, and management of the hygiene station intervention. Data were also collected from communications and reports released through SPU/PHSKC web sources.
RESULTS: Our analysis revealed factors affecting the implementation of the hygiene program included the rental of hygiene trailers, community partnership to mediate between housed and housing insecure populations, funding source and cost-effectiveness, geographic location of the units, and maintenance of the units to continue population hygiene support.
CONCLUSION: The SPU/PHSKC hygiene station was designed to support the housing insecure and homeless by compensating for the large-scale closures of public restrooms and showers. Several logistical and financing challenges need to be addressed to ensure the continuity of the program.
STUDY DESIGN: We conduct a qualitative analysis using semi-structured interviews.
METHODS: We interviewed four Seattle Public Utility (SPU) and Public Health Seattle & King County (PHSKC) employees involved in the design, deployment, and management of the hygiene station intervention. Data were also collected from communications and reports released through SPU/PHSKC web sources.
RESULTS: Our analysis revealed factors affecting the implementation of the hygiene program included the rental of hygiene trailers, community partnership to mediate between housed and housing insecure populations, funding source and cost-effectiveness, geographic location of the units, and maintenance of the units to continue population hygiene support.
CONCLUSION: The SPU/PHSKC hygiene station was designed to support the housing insecure and homeless by compensating for the large-scale closures of public restrooms and showers. Several logistical and financing challenges need to be addressed to ensure the continuity of the program.