Maternal and child health journal · 2021
Pre-pregnancy and Prenatal Alcohol use Among American Indian and Alaska Native and Non-Hispanic White Women: Findings from PRAMS in Five States.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hebert Luciana E, Sarche Michelle C
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Estimates of prenatal alcohol use among American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women are limited. This study sought to characterize pre-pregnancy and prenatal alcohol use among AI/AN women in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) dataset, evaluate variation in alcohol use by state and rural/urban residence, and evaluate associations between potential risk factors and prenatal alcohol use among AI/AN and non-Hispanic white (NHW) women.
METHODS: We pooled PRAMS data from five states (Alaska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Washington) from 2015 to 2017. We estimated the prevalence of pre-pregnancy and pregnancy risk factors, and alcohol use by race and examined alcohol use by state and rural/urban residence among AI/AN women. We conducted bivariate and multivariable logistic regression modelling to estimate the association between each risk factor of interest and the odds of prenatal alcohol use for AI/AN and NHW women.
RESULTS: AI/AN women were less likely to report pre-pregnancy alcohol use compared to NHW women (56% vs. 76%, p < 0.0001). Among women who reported drinking pre-pregnancy, AI/AN women were more likely than NHW women to report drinking 1 or more drinks during pregnancy (4.3% vs. 2.4, p = 0.0049). For AI/AN women, older age and experiencing homelessness (aOR = 2.76; 95% CI 1.16-6.55) increased odds of prenatal alcohol use. For NHW women, having a college education (aOR = 4.06; 95% CI 1.19-13.88) and urban residence (aOR = 1.88; 95% CI 1.40-2.53) increased odds of prenatal alcohol use.
CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with prenatal alcohol use differ between AI/AN women and NHW women, suggesting the need for tailored interventions.
METHODS: We pooled PRAMS data from five states (Alaska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Washington) from 2015 to 2017. We estimated the prevalence of pre-pregnancy and pregnancy risk factors, and alcohol use by race and examined alcohol use by state and rural/urban residence among AI/AN women. We conducted bivariate and multivariable logistic regression modelling to estimate the association between each risk factor of interest and the odds of prenatal alcohol use for AI/AN and NHW women.
RESULTS: AI/AN women were less likely to report pre-pregnancy alcohol use compared to NHW women (56% vs. 76%, p < 0.0001). Among women who reported drinking pre-pregnancy, AI/AN women were more likely than NHW women to report drinking 1 or more drinks during pregnancy (4.3% vs. 2.4, p = 0.0049). For AI/AN women, older age and experiencing homelessness (aOR = 2.76; 95% CI 1.16-6.55) increased odds of prenatal alcohol use. For NHW women, having a college education (aOR = 4.06; 95% CI 1.19-13.88) and urban residence (aOR = 1.88; 95% CI 1.40-2.53) increased odds of prenatal alcohol use.
CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with prenatal alcohol use differ between AI/AN women and NHW women, suggesting the need for tailored interventions.