MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001548

Медицинская библиотека · Medical care · 2021

Comparison of Patient Experience Between Primary Care Settings Tailored for Homeless Clientele and Mainstream Care Settings.

Kertesz Stefan G, deRussy Aerin J, Kim Young-Il, Hoge April E, Austin Erika L, Gordon Adam J, Gelberg Lillian, Gabrielian Sonya E, Riggs Kevin R, Blosnich John R, Montgomery Ann E, Holmes Sally K, Varley Allyson L, Pollio David E, Gundlapalli Adi V, Jones Audrey L

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

More than 1 million Americans receive primary care from federal homeless health care programs yearly. Vulnerabilities that can make care challenging include pain, addiction, psychological distress, and a lack of shelter. Research on the effectiveness of tailoring services for this population is limited.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to examine whether homeless-tailored primary care programs offer a superior patient experience compared with nontailored ("mainstream") programs overall, and for highly vulnerable patients.

RESEARCH

DESIGN

National patient survey comparing 26 US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers' homeless-tailored primary care ("H-PACT"s) to mainstream primary care ("mainstream PACT"s) at the same locations.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 5766 homeless-experienced veterans.

MEASURES: Primary care experience on 4 scales: Patient-Clinician Relationship, Cooperation, Accessibility/Coordination, and Homeless-Specific Needs. Mean scores (range: 1-4) were calculated and dichotomized as unfavorable versus not. We counted key vulnerabilities (chronic pain, unsheltered homelessness, severe psychological distress, and history of overdose, 0-4), and categorized homeless-experienced veterans as having fewer (≤1) and more (≥2) vulnerabilities.

RESULTS

H-PACTs outscored mainstream PACTs on all scales (all P<0.001). Unfavorable care experiences were more common in mainstream PACTs compared with H-PACTs, with adjusted risk differences of 11.9% (95% CI=6.3-17.4), 12.6% (6.2-19.1), 11.7% (6.0-17.3), and 12.6% (6.2-19.1) for Relationship, Cooperation, Access/Coordination, and Homeless-Specific Needs, respectively. For the Relationship and Cooperation scales, H-PACTs were associated with a greater reduction in unfavorable experience for patients with ≥2 vulnerabilities versus ≤1 (interaction P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Organizations that offer primary care for persons experiencing homelessness can improve the primary care experience by tailoring the design and delivery of services.

Для цитирования: Kertesz Stefan G, deRussy Aerin J, Kim Young-Il, Hoge April E, Austin Erika L, Gordon Adam J, Gelberg Lillian, Gabrielian Sonya E, Riggs Kevin R, Blosnich John R, Montgomery Ann E, Holmes Sally K, Varley Allyson L, Pollio David E, Gundlapalli Adi V, Jones Audrey L. Comparison of Patient Experience Between Primary Care Settings Tailored for Homeless Clientele and Mainstream Care Settings.. Medical care. 2021. DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001548.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.