Early intervention in psychiatry · 2020
Sociodemographic, clinical and help-seeking characteristics of homeless young people with recent onset of psychosis enrolled in specialized early intervention services.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Rufina, Scodes Jennifer, van der Ven Els, Alves-Bradford Jean-Marie, Mascayano Franco, Smith Stephen, Dixon Lisa
Аннотация
AIM: To examine differences in demographic, clinical, social, functional and help-seeking characteristics of homeless vs housed individuals enrolled in specialized early intervention teams in the United States.
METHODS: Participants comprised 1349 individuals enrolled across 21 teams. Teams report individual-level data including homelessness status at admission. Bivariate differences between homeless and housed participants were analysed using Wilcoxon-rank, chi-square, Fisher-exact and t tests, as appropriate.
RESULTS: Approximately 5% of participants were homeless at admission. Homeless participants were less likely to be enrolled in school and/or employed (12.2% vs 43.4%); to have more involvement in the legal system (23.0% vs 6.2%); and to have had a more restrictive pathway to care, than housed participants.
CONCLUSIONS: Homeless young people with recent-onset psychosis have a substantially greater need for a diversity of services for psychosocial needs. Homeless individuals may also have a more adverse pathway to care and directed outreach to engage this population may be needed.
METHODS: Participants comprised 1349 individuals enrolled across 21 teams. Teams report individual-level data including homelessness status at admission. Bivariate differences between homeless and housed participants were analysed using Wilcoxon-rank, chi-square, Fisher-exact and t tests, as appropriate.
RESULTS: Approximately 5% of participants were homeless at admission. Homeless participants were less likely to be enrolled in school and/or employed (12.2% vs 43.4%); to have more involvement in the legal system (23.0% vs 6.2%); and to have had a more restrictive pathway to care, than housed participants.
CONCLUSIONS: Homeless young people with recent-onset psychosis have a substantially greater need for a diversity of services for psychosocial needs. Homeless individuals may also have a more adverse pathway to care and directed outreach to engage this population may be needed.