Medical care · 2026
The Scope of Care Coordination for Older Adults Whose Dominant Provider Is a Nurse Practitioner Versus a Primary Care Physician.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McMenamin Amy, O'Reilly-Jacob Monica, Nahid Musarrat, Pinheiro Laura C, Safford Monika, Kern Lisa M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Nurse practitioners (NPs) play an increasingly prominent role in primary care, particularly in low-income and rural communities. Yet the differences in care coordination demands between NP-dominant and physician-dominant primary care remain unknown. As the number of providers involved in a patient's care increases, the complexity of care coordination also increases.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if the scope of care coordination (ie, the number of other providers involved in a patient's care) varies by NP versus generalist physician.
METHODS: In 2425 participants from the nationwide Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study linked with 2013-2016 Medicare claims, we conducted a cross-sectional study using negative binomial regression analyses.
RESULTS: Our sample was 52.1% female with a mean age of 75.6 years. Participants with dominant NPs (n=146, 6%) were more likely to be dually eligible for Medicaid and reside in rural areas, but had fewer chronic conditions than those with dominant generalist physicians (n=2279, 94%). The median number of other unique providers involved in care was 4 (IQR=2-6) for NP-dominant patients versus 3 (IQR=2-6) for physician-dominant patients. After adjusting for covariates, those with dominant NPs had 19% more unique providers involved in their care (IRR=1.19, 95% CI: 1.07-1.32). Among participants with 5+ chronic conditions, participants with dominant NPs were seen by 31% more unique providers per year (IRR=1.31, 95% CI: 1.12-1.54).
CONCLUSION: Older adults receiving NP-dominant primary care had a broader scope of care coordination than those receiving generalist physician-dominant primary care, especially among those with 5+ chronic conditions.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if the scope of care coordination (ie, the number of other providers involved in a patient's care) varies by NP versus generalist physician.
METHODS: In 2425 participants from the nationwide Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study linked with 2013-2016 Medicare claims, we conducted a cross-sectional study using negative binomial regression analyses.
RESULTS: Our sample was 52.1% female with a mean age of 75.6 years. Participants with dominant NPs (n=146, 6%) were more likely to be dually eligible for Medicaid and reside in rural areas, but had fewer chronic conditions than those with dominant generalist physicians (n=2279, 94%). The median number of other unique providers involved in care was 4 (IQR=2-6) for NP-dominant patients versus 3 (IQR=2-6) for physician-dominant patients. After adjusting for covariates, those with dominant NPs had 19% more unique providers involved in their care (IRR=1.19, 95% CI: 1.07-1.32). Among participants with 5+ chronic conditions, participants with dominant NPs were seen by 31% more unique providers per year (IRR=1.31, 95% CI: 1.12-1.54).
CONCLUSION: Older adults receiving NP-dominant primary care had a broader scope of care coordination than those receiving generalist physician-dominant primary care, especially among those with 5+ chronic conditions.