Journal of reconstructive microsurgery · 2025
Local Capacity Building, Constraints, and Microsurgical Reconstruction in a Low-Resource Country: A Cross-sectional Study of Surgeons.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Olawoye Olayinka A, Mijares-Diaz Fernando, Ademola Samuel A, Iyun Ayodele O, Michael Afieharo I, Aderibigbe Rotimi O, Oluwatosin Odunayo M, Ogunleye Adeyemi A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: While the need for reconstructive microsurgical procedures has increased across the developing world, several constraints in low- and middle-income settings prevent its consistent performance. Our study aimed to understand the impact of microsurgery training on local capacity in a low-income setting, and to understand limitations that may affect long-term build-up of microsurgical capacity.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study evaluating survey responses of trainees and surgeons who participated in a Flap Transfer and Microsurgery course held in Ibadan, Nigeria. The survey consisted of a pre- and postcourse questionnaire, and a 2-year posttraining survey. The questionnaire sought to assess training impact on microsurgical capacity and limitations at each participants institution. Fourteen surgeons completed all questionnaires and were included in the study.
RESULTS: Thirteen (92.3%) participants had encountered at least one defect requiring microvascular surgery within 2 years of the training, and 9 (69.2%) reported having performed at least one surgery. Most surgeons indicated having performed less procedures than needed across all defect anatomical site/etiology. The most common limitation reported by participants consisted of man-power shortage (78.6%), followed by expense of each procedure, difficulty procuring materials, and trainers with limited experience.
CONCLUSION: There is a significant need for microsurgical reconstruction in sub-Saharan Africa, with varied local challenges preventing consistent delivery of microsurgical care. The analysis complements previous literature on microsurgical care in developing countries and highlights significant constraints preventing widespread adoption and the role of local training opportunities that help in building long-term local capacity.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study evaluating survey responses of trainees and surgeons who participated in a Flap Transfer and Microsurgery course held in Ibadan, Nigeria. The survey consisted of a pre- and postcourse questionnaire, and a 2-year posttraining survey. The questionnaire sought to assess training impact on microsurgical capacity and limitations at each participants institution. Fourteen surgeons completed all questionnaires and were included in the study.
RESULTS: Thirteen (92.3%) participants had encountered at least one defect requiring microvascular surgery within 2 years of the training, and 9 (69.2%) reported having performed at least one surgery. Most surgeons indicated having performed less procedures than needed across all defect anatomical site/etiology. The most common limitation reported by participants consisted of man-power shortage (78.6%), followed by expense of each procedure, difficulty procuring materials, and trainers with limited experience.
CONCLUSION: There is a significant need for microsurgical reconstruction in sub-Saharan Africa, with varied local challenges preventing consistent delivery of microsurgical care. The analysis complements previous literature on microsurgical care in developing countries and highlights significant constraints preventing widespread adoption and the role of local training opportunities that help in building long-term local capacity.