HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2011
Genexol inhibits primary tumour growth and metastases in gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shea Jill E, Nam Kweon-Ho, Rapoport Natalya, Scaife Courtney L
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Gemcitabine, the current standard of care for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), has a less than 10% partial response rate. Genexol-PM, a modified form of paclitaxel, has been shown to have antitumour effects in clinical trials of metastatic breast and small-lung-cell carcinoma. The aim of the present study was to determine if Genexol would be a beneficial treatment for gemcitabine-resistant PDA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured the in vitro IC50s of gemcitabine and genexol in cell lines sensitive and resistant to gemcitabine. In vivo, animals with orthotopic pancreatic tumours, resistant to gemcitabine, were treated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), gemcitabine, Genexol or gemcitabine+Genexol. Tumour progression was monitored using red fluorescent protein imaging.
RESULTS: We showed equivalent IC50s for gemcitabine-sensitive and gemcitabine-resistant cell lines when treated with genexol. In vivo treatment with genexol resulted in a greater per cent reduction in tumour size, less metastatic spread and longer survival compared with treatment with gemcitabine.
DISCUSSION: Genexol proved to be an effective treatment for gemcitabine-resistant PDA. These data combined with the successful clinical use of genexol in Phase II trials of other malignancies suggests it maybe an effective treatment for pancreatic cancer, specifically for those patients resistant to gemcitabine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured the in vitro IC50s of gemcitabine and genexol in cell lines sensitive and resistant to gemcitabine. In vivo, animals with orthotopic pancreatic tumours, resistant to gemcitabine, were treated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), gemcitabine, Genexol or gemcitabine+Genexol. Tumour progression was monitored using red fluorescent protein imaging.
RESULTS: We showed equivalent IC50s for gemcitabine-sensitive and gemcitabine-resistant cell lines when treated with genexol. In vivo treatment with genexol resulted in a greater per cent reduction in tumour size, less metastatic spread and longer survival compared with treatment with gemcitabine.
DISCUSSION: Genexol proved to be an effective treatment for gemcitabine-resistant PDA. These data combined with the successful clinical use of genexol in Phase II trials of other malignancies suggests it maybe an effective treatment for pancreatic cancer, specifically for those patients resistant to gemcitabine.