MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ana.0000000000001033

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology · 2025

Perspectives on Analgesia for Craniotomy: A Survey of Anesthetic Practices.

Vincent Anita, Burbridge Mark A, Chaikittisilpa Nophanan, Chakraborty Indranil, Chong Michelle, Chowdhury Tumul, Garcia Paul, Gaudet John G, Kiatchai Taniga, Prabhakar Hemanshu, Shiferaw Ananya A, Shrestha Gentle S, Tan Peter C S, Tavares Cristiane, Vacas Susana, Blacker Samuel N, Lele Abhijit V, Mejia-Mantilla Jorge

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare analgesic practices for patients undergoing craniotomy in high-income countries (HICs) and low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), focusing on variations in medication use and techniques.

METHODS

An English-language and Spanish-language electronic survey was sent to over 300 anesthesiologists in 35 countries from March 22 to May 19, 2024, to gather data on analgesia for craniotomy patients. Anonymous responses through REDCap were analyzed as a whole and by income category (HICs and LMICs).

RESULTS

We received 328 responses (105 HICs, 221 LMICs, and 2 missing locations). Acetaminophen was used by 78% of respondents (HIC: 82%, LMIC: 76%), with low nonavailability in both groups (0.95% HICs, 4.98% LMICs). Fentanyl boluses were used in 57% of cases (HIC: 60%, LMIC: 55%). Incisional local anesthesia was administered in 51% (HIC: 52%, LMIC: 50%), with minimal nonavailability (1.9% HIC, 1.4% LMIC). The use of a remifentanil infusion was more common in HICs (64%) than LMICs (31%), where nonavailability was significantly higher (43.89% vs. 7.62% HICs). Scalp blocks were used by 15% of HICs and 43% of LMICs. Craniotomy indication influenced the choice of analgesia for 61% of respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

Analgesic practices for craniotomy vary significantly between HICs and LMICs, primarily due to medication availability. Global guidelines should consider resource differences to improve postoperative pain management.

Для цитирования: Vincent Anita, Burbridge Mark A, Chaikittisilpa Nophanan, Chakraborty Indranil, Chong Michelle, Chowdhury Tumul, Garcia Paul, Gaudet John G, Kiatchai Taniga, Prabhakar Hemanshu, Shiferaw Ananya A, Shrestha Gentle S, Tan Peter C S, Tavares Cristiane, Vacas Susana, Blacker Samuel N, Lele Abhijit V, Mejia-Mantilla Jorge. Perspectives on Analgesia for Craniotomy: A Survey of Anesthetic Practices.. Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/ana.0000000000001033.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.