Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
Health Predictors of Neighborhood Selection: A Prospective Cohort Study of Residential Mobility in Ontario, Canada.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Buajitti Emmalin, Rosella Laura C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Health selection into neighborhoods describes unhealthy people moving disproportionately to lower-income neighborhoods, producing observable socioeconomic gradients sometimes falsely attributed to neighborhood effects on health. We investigated residential mobility outcomes and their relationship to baseline health using population-level data linkages in Ontario, Canada.
METHODS: We included Canadian Community Health Survey respondents ages 25 to 64 between 2005 and 2014 (n = 93,235). We assessed baseline health using self-reported health and multimorbidity. We captured moves using health administrative data and the Canadian census. We fit multinomial logistic regression models with a six-category residential mobility outcome: (1) nonmovers from low-income neighborhoods; (2) nonmovers from high-income neighborhoods; (3) movers from low-income to low-income; (4) movers from low-income to high-income; (5) movers from high-income to low-income; and (6) movers from high-income to high-income. We adjusted models for the Canadian Community Health Survey cycle, age, sex, household income, immigrant status, and residential instability.
RESULTS: Compared with those with very good or excellent health, respondents reporting fair or poor health at baseline had higher odds of moving from low- to low-income neighborhoods (Adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.46, 2.05), moving from high- to low-income (aOR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.35, 1.98), moving from low- to high-income (aOR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.04, 1.54), and not moving within low-income (aOR = 1.36; 1.23, 1.51) relative to not moving within high-income. Results were consistent for objective health measures, comparing respondents with at least four chronic conditions to those with one or none.
CONCLUSIONS: In a large, population-based study, both subjective and objective measures of health had a strong relationship with residential mobility outcomes.
METHODS: We included Canadian Community Health Survey respondents ages 25 to 64 between 2005 and 2014 (n = 93,235). We assessed baseline health using self-reported health and multimorbidity. We captured moves using health administrative data and the Canadian census. We fit multinomial logistic regression models with a six-category residential mobility outcome: (1) nonmovers from low-income neighborhoods; (2) nonmovers from high-income neighborhoods; (3) movers from low-income to low-income; (4) movers from low-income to high-income; (5) movers from high-income to low-income; and (6) movers from high-income to high-income. We adjusted models for the Canadian Community Health Survey cycle, age, sex, household income, immigrant status, and residential instability.
RESULTS: Compared with those with very good or excellent health, respondents reporting fair or poor health at baseline had higher odds of moving from low- to low-income neighborhoods (Adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.46, 2.05), moving from high- to low-income (aOR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.35, 1.98), moving from low- to high-income (aOR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.04, 1.54), and not moving within low-income (aOR = 1.36; 1.23, 1.51) relative to not moving within high-income. Results were consistent for objective health measures, comparing respondents with at least four chronic conditions to those with one or none.
CONCLUSIONS: In a large, population-based study, both subjective and objective measures of health had a strong relationship with residential mobility outcomes.