Renal failure · 2025
Impact of rapamycin on delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients: a meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tang Yan, Zhu Jiefu, Mao Xiaolan, Cai Zhitao
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of rapamycin on DFG (delayed graft function in kidney transplant) recipients through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and other databases for studies assessing rapamycin use in kidney transplantation with a focus on DGF. The search was conducted from the time of database construction to December 2024. Literature search and quality evaluation were conducted by two researchers. Data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3, with odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. The meta-analysis was performed with Q-I2; fixed model for I2 < 50%; sensitivity analysis for I2 ≥ 50%. p Values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Nine studies (n = 9,219) were included. Rapamycin was associated with an increased risk of DGF (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.04-1.58), with a prolonged DGF duration (MD = 8.86, 95% CI: 3.84-13.89). No significant differences were found in graft survival (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.72-2.73); patient survival (OR = 1.89, 95% CI: 0.84-4.26), or rejection incidence (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.78-1.90).
CONCLUSIONS: Rapamycin significantly increases the risk and duration of DGF after kidney transplantation. However, it does not appear to affect long-term outcomes such as graft survival or rejection rates. These findings suggest that rapamycin should be used cautiously in transplant recipients at risk for DGF, and further studies are needed to optimize immunosuppressive strategies for this population.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and other databases for studies assessing rapamycin use in kidney transplantation with a focus on DGF. The search was conducted from the time of database construction to December 2024. Literature search and quality evaluation were conducted by two researchers. Data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3, with odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. The meta-analysis was performed with Q-I2; fixed model for I2 < 50%; sensitivity analysis for I2 ≥ 50%. p Values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Nine studies (n = 9,219) were included. Rapamycin was associated with an increased risk of DGF (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.04-1.58), with a prolonged DGF duration (MD = 8.86, 95% CI: 3.84-13.89). No significant differences were found in graft survival (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.72-2.73); patient survival (OR = 1.89, 95% CI: 0.84-4.26), or rejection incidence (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.78-1.90).
CONCLUSIONS: Rapamycin significantly increases the risk and duration of DGF after kidney transplantation. However, it does not appear to affect long-term outcomes such as graft survival or rejection rates. These findings suggest that rapamycin should be used cautiously in transplant recipients at risk for DGF, and further studies are needed to optimize immunosuppressive strategies for this population.