MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa2503189

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2025

Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis with Cyclophosphamide and Cyclosporin.

Curtis David J, Patil Sushrut S, Reynolds John, Purtill Duncan, Lewis Clinton, Ritchie David S, Gottlieb David J, Yeung David T, Wong Eric, Tey Siok-Keen, Perera Travis, Moore John, Koldej Rachel M, De Abreu Lourenco Richard, Stubbs John, Morrissey C Orla, Munsef Nadia, Arenas Andrea, Hill Geoffrey R, Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group

Клиническое исследование III фазыСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation (SCT) from a matched related donor after myeloablative conditioning is the preferred curative treatment for patients with high-risk blood cancers. The combination of a calcineurin inhibitor and an antimetabolite remains standard care for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in these patients. Data from two randomized trials have suggested that post-transplantation cyclophosphamide can reduce the risk of GVHD after SCT from a matched donor when it is added to or replaces the antimetabolite. However, the effects of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide specifically after SCT from a matched related donor remain uncertain, and effects in the context of myeloablative conditioning are unclear.

METHODS

We randomly assigned adults who were undergoing SCT from a matched related donor after myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning to receive either post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-cyclosporin (experimental prophylaxis) or cyclosporin-methotrexate (standard prophylaxis). The primary end point was GVHD-free, relapse-free survival.

RESULTS

Among 134 patients who underwent randomization, 66 were assigned to receive experimental prophylaxis and 68 to receive standard prophylaxis. GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was significantly longer with experimental prophylaxis (median, 26.2 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.1 to not reached) than with standard prophylaxis (median, 6.4 months; 95% CI, 5.6 to 8.3; P<0.001 by a log-rank test). GVHD-free, relapse-free survival at 3 years was 49% (95% CI, 36 to 61) with experimental prophylaxis and 14% (95% CI, 6 to 25) with standard prophylaxis (hazard ratio for GVHD, relapse, or death, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.66). The cumulative incidence of grade III to IV acute GVHD at 3 months was 3% (95% CI, 1 to 10) in the experimental-prophylaxis group and 10% (95% CI, 4 to 19) in the standard-prophylaxis group. At 2 years, overall survival was 83% and 71%, respectively (hazard ratio for death, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.19). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar in the two groups in the first 100 days after SCT.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and a calcineurin inhibitor led to longer GVHD-free, relapse-free survival than standard prophylaxis after transplantation from a matched related donor with either reduced-intensity or myeloablative conditioning in patients with blood cancers. (Funded by the Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund and others; ALLG BM12 CAST Australian-New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12618000505202.).

Для цитирования: Curtis David J, Patil Sushrut S, Reynolds John, Purtill Duncan, Lewis Clinton, Ritchie David S, Gottlieb David J, Yeung David T, Wong Eric, Tey Siok-Keen, Perera Travis, Moore John, Koldej Rachel M, De Abreu Lourenco Richard, Stubbs John, Morrissey C Orla, Munsef Nadia, Arenas Andrea, Hill Geoffrey R, Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group. Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis with Cyclophosphamide and Cyclosporin.. The New England journal of medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2503189.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.