Advances in therapy · 2024
Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients with MS: Results from the ESTEEM Phase 4 and PROCLAIM Phase 3 Studies with a Focus on Older Patients.
Клиническое исследование III фазыКлиническое исследование IV фазыСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mao-Draayer Yang, Bar-Or Amit, Balashov Konstantin, Foley John, Smoot Kyle, Longbrake Erin E, Robertson Derrick, Mendoza Jason P, Lewin James B, Everage Nicholas, Božin Ivan, Lyons Jennifer, Mokliatchouk Oksana, Bame Eris, Giuliani Fabrizio
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Real-world studies in the USA report that 41-56% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are ≥ 50 years old, yet data on their response to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is limited. Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is an oral DMT approved for treating relapsing MS. This analysis evaluated the safety, efficacy, and immunophenotype changes of DMF in patients ≥ 50 years compared with patients < 50 years.
METHODS: ESTEEM, a 5-year, real-world, observational phase 4 study, assessed the safety and effectiveness of DMF, including treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events (AEs) leading to treatment discontinuation. Absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) were recorded from a subset of patients. The PROCLAIM study, a phase 3b interventional study, reported safety outcomes and lymphocyte subset changes in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) treated with DMF. The study evaluated safety outcomes by analyzing the incidence of SAEs and detailed changes in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell compartments over 96 weeks of DMF treatment.
RESULTS: ESTEEM included 4020 patients aged < 50 years and 1069 aged ≥ 50 years. AEs leading to discontinuation were reported by 19.6% patients < 50 years and 29.6% of patients ≥ 50 years, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common. SAEs were reported by 5.2% of patients < 50 years and 8.9% those ≥ 50 years. In PROCLAIM, SAEs were reported in 13% of patients < 50 years and 10% of those ≥ 50 years. Median ALC decreased by 35% in patients < 50 years and 50% in those ≥ 50 years in ESTEEM, with similar patterns observed in PROCLAIM.
CONCLUSIONS: ESTEEM found no unexpected safety signals in older patients and annualized relapse rates (ARRs) were significantly reduced in both age groups. Both studies indicated that DMF is efficacious and has a favorable safety profile in patients with RRMS aged ≥ 50 years.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ESTEEM (NCT02047097), PROCLAIM (NCT02525874).
METHODS: ESTEEM, a 5-year, real-world, observational phase 4 study, assessed the safety and effectiveness of DMF, including treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events (AEs) leading to treatment discontinuation. Absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) were recorded from a subset of patients. The PROCLAIM study, a phase 3b interventional study, reported safety outcomes and lymphocyte subset changes in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) treated with DMF. The study evaluated safety outcomes by analyzing the incidence of SAEs and detailed changes in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell compartments over 96 weeks of DMF treatment.
RESULTS: ESTEEM included 4020 patients aged < 50 years and 1069 aged ≥ 50 years. AEs leading to discontinuation were reported by 19.6% patients < 50 years and 29.6% of patients ≥ 50 years, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common. SAEs were reported by 5.2% of patients < 50 years and 8.9% those ≥ 50 years. In PROCLAIM, SAEs were reported in 13% of patients < 50 years and 10% of those ≥ 50 years. Median ALC decreased by 35% in patients < 50 years and 50% in those ≥ 50 years in ESTEEM, with similar patterns observed in PROCLAIM.
CONCLUSIONS: ESTEEM found no unexpected safety signals in older patients and annualized relapse rates (ARRs) were significantly reduced in both age groups. Both studies indicated that DMF is efficacious and has a favorable safety profile in patients with RRMS aged ≥ 50 years.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ESTEEM (NCT02047097), PROCLAIM (NCT02525874).