MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087373

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2024

Maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplantation: results from CESIT study, an Italian retrospective cohort study.

Bellini Arianna, Finocchietti Marco, Rosa Alessandro Cesare, Masiero Lucia, Trapani Silvia, Cardillo Massimo, Massari Marco, Spila Alegiani Stefania, Pierobon Silvia, Ferroni Eliana, Zanforlini Martina, Leoni Olivia, Ledda Stefano, Garau Donatella, Davoli Marina, Addis Antonio, Belleudi Valeria, CESIT Study Group

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the use of maintenance immunosuppressive treatments following liver transplantation and to compare their risk-benefit profiles in clinical practice.

DESIGN

Retrospective multicentrer cohort study.

SETTING

Four Italian regions (Lombardy, Veneto, Lazio, Sardinia).

METHODS

Data were integrated from the national transplant information system and administrative claims data from four Italian regions. All adults who underwent incident liver transplantation between 2009 and 2019 were identified and categorised into two groups: cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The trend of immunosuppressive treatment over years was analysed, and their effectiveness/safety profiles were compared using multivariate Cox models (HR; 95% CI).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality, transplant reject/graft failure, incidence of severe infections, cancer, diabetes, major adverse cardiovascular events and lipid-modifying agents use.

RESULTS

The study comprised 750 subjects in the cirrhosis cohort and 1159 in the HCC cohort. Over the study years, there was a decline in the use of cyclosporine-CsA, while combination therapy involving tacrolimus with other drugs increased compared with monotherapy. Overall, tacrolimus monotherapy use was slightly over 40% in both groups, followed by tacrolimus+mycophenolate (39.5%-cirrhosis; 30.6%-HCC) and tacrolimus+molecular target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) (8.5%-cirrhosis; 13.3%-HCC). No significant differences emerged in risk-benefit profile of different tacrolimus-based therapies, except for a higher risk of mortality in cirrhosis subjects under tacrolimus monotherapy compared with tacrolimus+mycophenolate (HR: 2.07; 1.17 to 3.65).

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights a shift over time in postliver transplant therapeutic patterns, favouring the use of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate or mTORi, rather than monotherapy. Moreover, a potential association between tacrolimus monotherapy and increased mortality in the cirrhosis cohort was identified. Further research is warranted to investigate these findings more deeply and to optimise treatment strategies for liver transplant recipients.

Для цитирования: Bellini Arianna, Finocchietti Marco, Rosa Alessandro Cesare, Masiero Lucia, Trapani Silvia, Cardillo Massimo, Massari Marco, Spila Alegiani Stefania, Pierobon Silvia, Ferroni Eliana, Zanforlini Martina, Leoni Olivia, Ledda Stefano, Garau Donatella, Davoli Marina, Addis Antonio, Belleudi Valeria, CESIT Study Group. Maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplantation: results from CESIT study, an Italian retrospective cohort study.. BMJ open. 2024. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087373.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.