MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002163

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open respiratory research · 2024

Mycophenolate and azathioprine efficacy in interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lombardi Francesco, Stewart Iain, Fabbri Laura, Adams Wendy, Kawano-Dourado Leticia, Ryerson Christopher J, Jenkins Gisli, REMAP-ILD Consortium

МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) are immunomodulatory treatments in interstitial lung disease (ILD). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of MMF or AZA on pulmonary function in ILD.

DESIGN

Population included any ILD diagnosis, intervention included MMF or AZA treatment, outcome was delta change from baseline in per cent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) and gas transfer (diffusion lung capacity of carbon monoxide, %DLco). The primary endpoint compared outcomes relative to placebo comparator, the secondary endpoint assessed outcomes in treated groups only.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective observational studies were included. No language restrictions were applied. Retrospective studies and studies with high-dose concomitant steroids were excluded.

DATA SYNTHESIS: The systematic search was performed on 9 May. Meta-analyses according to drug and outcome were specified with random effects, I2 evaluated heterogeneity and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation evaluated certainty of evidence. Primary endpoint analysis was restricted to RCT design, secondary endpoint included subgroup analysis according to prospective observational or RCT design.

RESULTS

A total of 2831 publications were screened, 12 were suitable for quantitative synthesis. Three MMF RCTs were included with no significant effect on the primary endpoints (%FVC 2.94, 95% CI -4.00 to 9.88, I2=79.3%; %DLco -2.03, 95% CI -4.38 to 0.32, I2=0.0%). An overall 2.03% change from baseline in %FVC (95% CI 0.65 to 3.42, I2=0.0%) was observed in MMF, and RCT subgroup summary estimated a 4.42% change from baseline in %DLCO (95% CI 2.05 to 6.79, I2=0.0%). AZA studies were limited. All estimates were considered very low certainty evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

There were limited RCTs of MMF or AZA and their benefit in ILD was of very low certainty. MMF may support preservation of pulmonary function, yet confidence in the effect was weak. To support high certainty evidence, RCTs should be designed to directly assess MMF efficacy in ILD.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023423223.

Для цитирования: Lombardi Francesco, Stewart Iain, Fabbri Laura, Adams Wendy, Kawano-Dourado Leticia, Ryerson Christopher J, Jenkins Gisli, REMAP-ILD Consortium. Mycophenolate and azathioprine efficacy in interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. BMJ open respiratory research. 2024. DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002163.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.