European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2023
Area under the curve of tacrolimus using microsampling devices: towards precision medicine in solid organ transplantation?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Couette Aurélien, Tron Camille, Golbin Léonard, Franck Bénédicte, Houssel-Debry Pauline, Frouget Thierry, Morin Marie-Pascale, Brenier Henri, Rayar Michel, Verdier Marie-Clémence, Vigneau Cécile, Chemouny Jonathan, Lemaitre Florian
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus using trough concentration (Cmin) is mandatory to ensure drug efficacy and safety in solid organ transplantation. However, Cmin is just a proxy for the area under the curve of drug concentrations (AUC) which is the best pharmacokinetic parameter for exposure evaluation. Some studies suggest that patients may present discrepancies between these two parameters. AUC is now easily available through mini-invasive microsampling approach. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between AUC and Cmin in patients benefiting from a complete pharmacokinetic profile using a microsampling approach.
METHODS: Fifty-one transplant recipients benefited from a complete pharmacokinetic profile using a microsampling approach, and their 24-h AUC were calculated using the trapezoidal method. The correlation with Cmin was then explored. In parallel, we estimated AUC using the sole Cmin and regression equations according to the post-transplantation days and the galenic form.
RESULTS: Weak correlations were found between 24-h AUC observed and the corresponding Cmin (R2 = 0.60) and between AUC observed and expected using the sole Cmin (R2 = 0.62). Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus using Cmin leads to over- or under-estimate drug exposure in 40.3% of patients.
CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus Cmin appears to be an imperfect reflection of drug exposure. Evaluating AUC using a microsampling approach offers a mini-invasive strategy to monitor tacrolimus treatment in transplant recipients.
METHODS: Fifty-one transplant recipients benefited from a complete pharmacokinetic profile using a microsampling approach, and their 24-h AUC were calculated using the trapezoidal method. The correlation with Cmin was then explored. In parallel, we estimated AUC using the sole Cmin and regression equations according to the post-transplantation days and the galenic form.
RESULTS: Weak correlations were found between 24-h AUC observed and the corresponding Cmin (R2 = 0.60) and between AUC observed and expected using the sole Cmin (R2 = 0.62). Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus using Cmin leads to over- or under-estimate drug exposure in 40.3% of patients.
CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus Cmin appears to be an imperfect reflection of drug exposure. Evaluating AUC using a microsampling approach offers a mini-invasive strategy to monitor tacrolimus treatment in transplant recipients.