MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/nhs.70063

Медицинская библиотека · Nursing & health sciences · 2025

Experience of Aging-In-Place in Older Adults Living Alone With Chronic Disease in Rural Areas in South Korea: A Grounded Theory Approach.

Park Go-Eun, Jang Hye-Young

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Rural areas in South Korea lack adequate healthcare facilities, and many older people wish to continue living in their current environment despite these challenges. This study derives a substantive theory on the aging-in-place process among older people living alone with chronic diseases in rural areas. Purposeful and theoretical sampling were used to select 18 participants. In-depth interviews were conducted over 3 months, and data were analyzed using Strauss and Corbin's grounded theory method. Twelve categories and 28 subcategories were identified, with the core category being "enduring inconvenience and utilizing available resources to live in a familiar environment." Participants faced challenges such as limited healthcare, isolation, and difficulty managing chronic illnesses. However, their desire to age in place was rooted in preserving their hometown's history. To cope, they practiced healthy behaviors, used social welfare services, and adapted their homes for safety. Four stages emerged: "preserving," "enduring," "utilizing," and "living." Our findings highlight the need for policies supporting older people with chronic diseases in rural areas to maintain their independence and connection to familiar environments.

Для цитирования: Park Go-Eun, Jang Hye-Young. Experience of Aging-In-Place in Older Adults Living Alone With Chronic Disease in Rural Areas in South Korea: A Grounded Theory Approach.. Nursing & health sciences. 2025. DOI: 10.1111/nhs.70063.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.