MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.resinv.2023.01.007

Медицинская библиотека · Respiratory investigation · 2023

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features and histologic usual interstitial pneumonia treated with anti-fibrotic versus immunosuppressive therapy.

Yamano Yasuhiko, Kataoka Kensuke, Takei Reoto, Sasano Hajime, Yokoyama Toshiki, Matsuda Toshiaki, Kimura Tomoki, Mori Yuta, Furukawa Taiki, Fukuoka Junya, Johko Takeshi, Kondoh Yasuhiro

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic strategies in patients with interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) and histological usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern (IPAF-UIP) have not been thoroughly evaluated. We compared the therapeutic efficacy of anti-fibrotic therapy with that of immunosuppressive treatment for patients with IPAF-UIP.

METHODS

In this retrospective case series, we identified consecutive IPAF-UIP patients treated with anti-fibrotic therapy or immunosuppressive therapy. Clinical characteristics, one-year treatment response, acute exacerbation, and survival were studied. We performed a stratified analysis by the pathological presence or absence of inflammatory cell infiltration.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients with anti-fibrotic therapy and 29 with immunosuppressive treatment were included. There was a significant difference in one-year forced vital capacity (FVC) change between patients with anti-fibrotic treatment (4 in 27 improved, 12 stable, and 11 worsened) and those with immunosuppressive treatment (16 in 29 improved, eight stable, and five worsened) (p = 0.006). There was also a significant difference in one-year St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) change between patients with anti-fibrotic therapy (2 in 27 improved, ten stable, and 15 worsened) and those with immunosuppressive treatment (14 in 29 improved, 12 stable, and worsened) (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in survival between the groups (p = 0.32). However, in the subgroup with histological inflammatory cell infiltration, survival was significantly better with immunosuppressive therapy (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In IPAF-UIP, immunosuppressive therapy seemed to be superior to anti-fibrotic treatment in terms of therapeutic response, and provided better outcomes in the histological inflammatory subgroup. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify the therapeutic strategy in IPAF-UIP.

Для цитирования: Yamano Yasuhiko, Kataoka Kensuke, Takei Reoto, Sasano Hajime, Yokoyama Toshiki, Matsuda Toshiaki, Kimura Tomoki, Mori Yuta, Furukawa Taiki, Fukuoka Junya, Johko Takeshi, Kondoh Yasuhiro. Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features and histologic usual interstitial pneumonia treated with anti-fibrotic versus immunosuppressive therapy.. Respiratory investigation. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.resinv.2023.01.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.