MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.47895/amp.vi0.2320

Медицинская библиотека · Acta medica Philippina · 2023

Knowledge and Preference of Filipino COPD Patients on Advance Care Planning: A Cross-sectional Survey.

Angeles Roland Reuben B, Jorge Manuel C, Abat Marc Evans M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To explore the current experiences and perspectives of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with advance care planning (ACP).

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among patients diagnosed with COPD in the Philippine General Hospital. Results were illustrated using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients were interviewed and included in the analysis. Nearly all patients were unfamiliar with the terms ACP (95.55%), end-of-life care (99.89%), and do-not-resuscitate order (100%). The majority expressed a desire to have ACP discussions (94.44%) which were not viewed as distressing and were deemed beneficial (96.67%). Patients who were employed were more likely to express readiness to sign legal papers. Patients living with their nuclear family or living alone, and those with higher COPD assessment test (CAT) scores were more likely to relegate health care decisions to their doctors.

CONCLUSION

Most patients with COPD in our cohort are unfamiliar with ACP and have not received ACP discussions. Most think that it will improve healthcare and quality of life. Some demographic and clinical factors may make patients more likely to engage in ACP-related activities.

Для цитирования: Angeles Roland Reuben B, Jorge Manuel C, Abat Marc Evans M. Knowledge and Preference of Filipino COPD Patients on Advance Care Planning: A Cross-sectional Survey.. Acta medica Philippina. 2023. DOI: 10.47895/amp.vi0.2320.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.