MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/geronb/gbx068

Медицинская библиотека · The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2017

Older Adults Without Close Kin in the United States.

Margolis Rachel, Verdery Ashton M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

We document the size and characteristics of the population of older adults without close kin in the contemporary United States.

METHODS

Using the Health and Retirement Study, we examine the prevalence of lacking different types and combinations of living kin, examine how kinless-ness is changing across birth cohorts, and provide estimates of kinless-ness for sociodemographic and health groups.

RESULTS

In 1998-2010, 6.6% of U.S. adults aged 55 and above lacked a living spouse and biological children and 1% lacked a partner/spouse, any children, biological siblings, and biological parents. Kinless-ness, defined both ways, is becoming more common among adults in their 50s and 60s for more recent birth cohorts. Lacking close kin is more prevalent among women than men, native born than immigrants, never-married, those living alone, college-educated women, those with low levels of wealth, and those in poor health.

DISCUSSION: Kinless-ness should be of interest to policy makers because it is more common among those with social, economic and health risks; those who live alone, with low levels of wealth, and disability. Aging research should address the implications of kinless-ness for public health, social isolation, and the demand for institutional care.

Для цитирования: Margolis Rachel, Verdery Ashton M. Older Adults Without Close Kin in the United States.. The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences. 2017. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbx068.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.