Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2016
Behind Closed Doors: Involuntary Treatment in Care of Persons with Cognitive Impairment at Home in the Netherlands.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hamers Jan P H, Bleijlevens Michel H C, Gulpers Math J M, Verbeek Hilde
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To explore the prevalence and associated factors of involuntary treatment (physical restraints, psychotropic medication, nonconsensual care) in persons with cognitive impairment receiving home care.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using association analyses.
SETTING: Professional home care in the southern part of the Netherlands.
PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected on 837 persons with cognitive impairment (mean age 81.6; 60% female).
MEASUREMENTS: Involuntary treatment was measured using a tool to identify physical restraints, psychotropic medication, and nonconsensual care. Activities of daily living (ADLs) were measured using the ADL Hierarchy subscale of the Resident Assistant Instrument-Minimum Data Set and cognitive status using the Cognitive Performance Scale. Informal caregiver burden was assessed using the Self-Perceived Pressure from Informal Care Scale.
RESULTS: Involuntary treatment was used in 39% of the total sample. Most common were nonconsensual care (79%; e.g., concealing medication in food, forcing hygiene) and psychotropic medication (41%). In 7% of the sample, physical restraints (e.g., deep or overturned chair, bilateral full-enclosure bedrails) were used. Caregiver burden, ADL dependency, cognitive status, living alone, and a diagnosis of dementia were strongly associated with involuntary treatment. The family of the person with cognitive impairment most often requested the use of involuntary treatment.
CONCLUSION: Involuntary treatment is often used in persons with cognitive impairment receiving home care in the Netherlands. Future research should focus on understanding and preventing inappropriate involuntary treatment in home care.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using association analyses.
SETTING: Professional home care in the southern part of the Netherlands.
PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected on 837 persons with cognitive impairment (mean age 81.6; 60% female).
MEASUREMENTS: Involuntary treatment was measured using a tool to identify physical restraints, psychotropic medication, and nonconsensual care. Activities of daily living (ADLs) were measured using the ADL Hierarchy subscale of the Resident Assistant Instrument-Minimum Data Set and cognitive status using the Cognitive Performance Scale. Informal caregiver burden was assessed using the Self-Perceived Pressure from Informal Care Scale.
RESULTS: Involuntary treatment was used in 39% of the total sample. Most common were nonconsensual care (79%; e.g., concealing medication in food, forcing hygiene) and psychotropic medication (41%). In 7% of the sample, physical restraints (e.g., deep or overturned chair, bilateral full-enclosure bedrails) were used. Caregiver burden, ADL dependency, cognitive status, living alone, and a diagnosis of dementia were strongly associated with involuntary treatment. The family of the person with cognitive impairment most often requested the use of involuntary treatment.
CONCLUSION: Involuntary treatment is often used in persons with cognitive impairment receiving home care in the Netherlands. Future research should focus on understanding and preventing inappropriate involuntary treatment in home care.