Internal and emergency medicine · 2007
Difficult hospital discharges in internal medicine wards.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nardi R, Scanelli G, Tragnone A, Lolli A, Kalfus P, Baldini A, Ghedini T, Bombarda S, Fiadino L, Di Ciommo S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Investigate the prevalence of difficult hospital discharges (DHD), describe clinical and social patients' characteristics as potential reasons for discharge delays in an internal medicine ward and implement tailored post-discharge care.
METHODS: During the year 2005 we analysed, in a middle-sized country hospital, all the patients for which some delay for discharge, owing to their whole complexity, was presumable. Comprehensive multidimensional assessment, clinical-social risk score, specific needs of care, mean of stay and outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS: 68.5% of DHD patients were >/=80 years old, with 3.8 the mean number of diseases per patient; 57.5% presented a loss of autonomy (ADL) just before acute deterioration; 80% were functionally and/or cognitively impaired. Only 5% had suitable family support; 5.1% were living at a nursing home; 2% were living alone. The most frequent causes of admission were stroke, cognitive impairment-dementia, cardiovascular diseases, fractures and cancer. Mean length of stay was 12 days. Fifty-two percent of patients were discharged home, 30% were admitted to a long-term care facility, 1% to hospice and 17% died during their hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: The aim of "coordinated care" (i.e., targeting "at-risk" patients with assessment of medical, functional, social and emotional needs; provision of optimal medical treatment, self-care education, integrated services, monitoring of progress and early signs of problems) is to improve health outcomes and reduce costs. More than 80% of DHDs patients, with specific tailored programmes, may be discharged from hospital, with satisfactory solutions for them and their families.
METHODS: During the year 2005 we analysed, in a middle-sized country hospital, all the patients for which some delay for discharge, owing to their whole complexity, was presumable. Comprehensive multidimensional assessment, clinical-social risk score, specific needs of care, mean of stay and outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS: 68.5% of DHD patients were >/=80 years old, with 3.8 the mean number of diseases per patient; 57.5% presented a loss of autonomy (ADL) just before acute deterioration; 80% were functionally and/or cognitively impaired. Only 5% had suitable family support; 5.1% were living at a nursing home; 2% were living alone. The most frequent causes of admission were stroke, cognitive impairment-dementia, cardiovascular diseases, fractures and cancer. Mean length of stay was 12 days. Fifty-two percent of patients were discharged home, 30% were admitted to a long-term care facility, 1% to hospice and 17% died during their hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: The aim of "coordinated care" (i.e., targeting "at-risk" patients with assessment of medical, functional, social and emotional needs; provision of optimal medical treatment, self-care education, integrated services, monitoring of progress and early signs of problems) is to improve health outcomes and reduce costs. More than 80% of DHDs patients, with specific tailored programmes, may be discharged from hospital, with satisfactory solutions for them and their families.