MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/10615806.2020.1772969

Медицинская библиотека · Anxiety, stress, and coping · 2020

Coping and resilience in adults: a cross-sectional network analysis.

Van der Hallen Ruth, Jongerling Joran, Godor Brian P

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Background and objectives: Coping and resilience, how we deal with problems and difficulties and recover from misfortune or change, are two well-known interrelated concepts within psychology. The question remains, however, to what extent the two overlap or differ.

Design

The present study investigated coping, resilience and their relationship using cross-sectional network analysis. Participants (N = 502), aged between 18 and 64 y old, completed an online survey including the Brief-COPE (Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced) and the SPF-24 (Scale of Protective Factors).

Results

Partial correlation networks on coping and resilience separately show strong, mostly positive associations, both within and between different cluster of coping and different higher-order resilience factors. Results for our combined partial correlation network indicate that coping and resilience are distinct, yet clearly related constructs and are likely to influence each other. Overall, the use of social support, active coping, goal efficacy and planning proved important in bridging coping and resilience.

Conclusion

The current findings are best replicated using time-series data, person-specific network models and clinical samples. Further implications for future research and clinical practice are discussed.

Для цитирования: Van der Hallen Ruth, Jongerling Joran, Godor Brian P. Coping and resilience in adults: a cross-sectional network analysis.. Anxiety, stress, and coping. 2020. DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2020.1772969.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.