Patient education and counseling · 2008
Subjective dimensions of patient competence: relationships with selected healthcare usage behaviors and general features of self-rated competence.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Weis Joachim, Giesler Jürgen M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To introduce the concept of patient competence and provide additional information on the concurrent validity of a new self-rating measure of patient competence in the context of cancer employing healthcare usage behaviors and more general self-rated features of patient competence as criteria.
METHODS: Based on a multi-center sample of n=536 patients with cancer, bivariate correlations and multiple regressions were computed.
RESULTS: The competence subscale of striving for autonomous decisions emerged as significant, albeit weak predictor of having used professional psycho-social support (r=.31, beta=.28) and employing other complementary medicines (r=.28; B=.65) in relation to one's cancer. Problem-focused and emotion-focused competencies relate differently to different general features of self-rated competence like feeling informed and assertive or adapting well.
CONCLUSION: Additional support for the concurrent validity of the new self-rating measure of patient competence in the context of cancer has been found. Viewed in perspective, this measure may therefore provide a methodological basis to examine determinants and health effects of patient competence empirically. Nevertheless, further research on the conceptualization and measurement of patient competence appears necessary.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Having available measures of patients' specific competencies in the context of cancer will help identify their strength and weaknesses in dealing with life-threatening disease and enhance their coping resources.
METHODS: Based on a multi-center sample of n=536 patients with cancer, bivariate correlations and multiple regressions were computed.
RESULTS: The competence subscale of striving for autonomous decisions emerged as significant, albeit weak predictor of having used professional psycho-social support (r=.31, beta=.28) and employing other complementary medicines (r=.28; B=.65) in relation to one's cancer. Problem-focused and emotion-focused competencies relate differently to different general features of self-rated competence like feeling informed and assertive or adapting well.
CONCLUSION: Additional support for the concurrent validity of the new self-rating measure of patient competence in the context of cancer has been found. Viewed in perspective, this measure may therefore provide a methodological basis to examine determinants and health effects of patient competence empirically. Nevertheless, further research on the conceptualization and measurement of patient competence appears necessary.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Having available measures of patients' specific competencies in the context of cancer will help identify their strength and weaknesses in dealing with life-threatening disease and enhance their coping resources.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Adaptation, PsychologicalAssertivenessAttitude to HealthDecision MakingFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInformed ConsentLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalMultivariate AnalysisNeeds AssessmentNeoplasmsPatient Education as TopicPersonal AutonomyPhysician-Patient RelationsRegression AnalysisSelf EfficacySocial SupportSurveys and Questionnaires