MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2008.00531.x

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of mental health nursing · 2008

Exploratory study of mental health consultation-liaison nursing in Australia: Part 2. Preparation, support and role satisfaction.

McNamara Paul, Bryant Jenni, Forster John, Sharrock Julie, Happell Brenda

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Mental health Consultation-Liaison (CL) nursing continues to develop and gain recognition as a subspecialty of mental health nursing. CL roles are particularly important given the significant number of people experiencing mental illness and other mental health problems within the general health-care settings. However, despite the potential value of these roles, the literature provides little information about these roles and about the nurses who work in these roles. This is the second part of a two-part paper describing a survey of CL nurses in Australia. Part 1 describes demographic data and characteristics of the CL role. Part 2 provides an exploration of the following factors: educational preparation, support, and work satisfaction. The findings identified specific educational needs in preparation and ongoing support for the role. However, overall the participants expressed a high level of satisfaction with their work. Given the current recruitment problems in mental health nursing, the promotion of the CL nursing role might enhance a more positive view of this branch of nursing.

Для цитирования: McNamara Paul, Bryant Jenni, Forster John, Sharrock Julie, Happell Brenda. Exploratory study of mental health consultation-liaison nursing in Australia: Part 2. Preparation, support and role satisfaction.. International journal of mental health nursing. 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2008.00531.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.