MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1037//0278-6133.10.3.155

Медицинская библиотека · Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 1991

High blood pressure and marital discord: not being nasty matters more than being nice.

Ewart C K, Taylor C B, Kraemer H C, Agras W S

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Theories linking anger and blood pressure (BP) reactivity to cardiovascular disease must be able to identify naturally occurring stressors that arouse emotion with sufficient frequency to cause chronic physiologic stress. We examine the impact of normal family arguments on 43 patients (24 women, 19 men) with essential hypertension. Patients and their partners discussed a threatening disagreement for 10 min while BP and conversation were recorded. Discussing problems increased BP, but the causal pathways differed by sex. In women, hostile interaction and marital dissatisfaction were associated with increased BP; "supportive" or "neutral" exchanges were unrelated to BP. In men, BP fluctuations were related only to the patient's speech rate. These findings are consistent with other research on sex differences in communication and social problem-solving styles and implicate different mechanisms (frequent anger, active coping) through which marital discord could increase risk. Implications for intervention are considered.

Для цитирования: Ewart C K, Taylor C B, Kraemer H C, Agras W S. High blood pressure and marital discord: not being nasty matters more than being nice.. Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association. 1991. DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.10.3.155.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.