Trigger tools are as effective as non-targeted chart review for adverse drug event detection in intensive care units.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the use of trigger tools and non-targeted chart review as methods for the detection of adverse drug events in an intensive care unit considering the health system of a developing country.

METHODS

Patients were divided in groups that were submitted to different methods (trigger tool and non-targeted chart review) for adverse drug event detection. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed, and adverse drug events detected during the data collection were analyzed by a multidisciplinary team and classified according to their causality, predictability, severity and damage level.

RESULTS

The search for adverse events performed by trigger tools and non-targeted chart review allowed the identification of similar numbers of events (61.09 and 64.04 ADE/1000 patient-days, respectively), types of event and related drugs. In both groups, the most frequently detected adverse events were related to metabolic, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular and hematological systems. These organic systems matched the drugs most associated with adverse event occurrence: anti-infectives, antithrombotics and insulins. Events identified by non-targeted chart review presented higher causality relationships and were considered less severe than those observed by trigger tool use (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The similar performance between these methods supports trigger tool applicability in the ICU routine, as this methodology requires less time to retrieve information from the medical records.