Antithrombotic efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants on patency rate following microsurgical anastomosis in crushed rat arteries.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
During the last decade direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have been established in various fields of medicine.Their use in microsurgery has not been evaluated yet though. This study aims to evaluate their efficacy in microsurgery and additionally compare them with a well established antithrombotic agent.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
The right femoral artery of 101 rats divided into 4 groups, was crushed and anastomosed. Group A (20 rats) received placebo therapy (1 ml NaCl 0.9%, orally), while Group B (27 rats), Group C (27 rats) and Group D (27 rats) received rivaroxaban (3 mg/kg, orally), dabigatran (30 mg/kg, orally) and enoxaparin (30 mg/kg, subcutaneously) respectively. All drugs were administered 3 h preoperatively and once daily for the following postoperative days until the sacrifice of the animals. Patency was evaluated at 1st, 7th and 20th postoperative day. Following patency evaluation the rats were sacrificed and the vessels were harvested for histological examination.
RESULTS
None of the rats died postoperatively. Patency rates of rivaroxaban group (78%), dabigatran group (70%) and enoxaparin group (63%) were statistically similar, but significantly higher than the placebo-treated control group (p < 0.05). Cells with morphologic features of endothelial cells were evident 7 days after the injury.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study demonstrate the following: (1) rivaroxaban and dabigatran through inhibition of thrombus formation significantly enhanced the patency rate compared to placebo treatment (2) the antithrombotic efficacy of rivaroxaban and dabigatran in compromised microvessels was similar to that of enoxaparin, the most widely used antithrombotic agent.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.