A Retrospective Cohort Study on the Use of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Stroke Mimics.

BACKGROUND

The urgency of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke can lead to inadvertent thrombolysis of patients with nonstroke diagnoses (stroke mimics), increasing the risk of adverse events. The objectives of this study were to compare thrombolysed acute ischemic stroke and stroke mimic cases based on demographic factors, physiological parameters, radiological findings, and clinical presentation, and to evaluate the clinical implications of thrombolysing stroke mimics.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a single-center database of all thrombolysed strokes and mimics over a period greater than 3 years. Diagnoses were confirmed by expert consensus after a review of clinical factors and imaging. Intercohort variation was assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum or Pearson's chi-square test.

RESULTS

The stroke mimic cohort tended to be younger (mean age 59.9 years versus 73.7 years, P < .001) and had a lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Score at presentation (mean 5.9 points versus 6.4 points, P < .01). However, the time taken from the onset of symptoms to delivery of thrombolytic drugs was longer in the mimic cohort (mean time 170 minutes versus 138 minutes, P < .01). Any differences in blood glucose (P = .07), time taken from hospital arrival to delivery of intravenous thrombolysis (P = .57), and blood pressure on admission (systolic, P = .09 and diastolic, P = .34) were not statistically significant. No adverse events were reported in the mimic cohort.

CONCLUSION

Despite similarities in clinical presentation, thrombolysed stroke mimics are of a different physiological and demographic population, and are associated with fewer adverse events compared with thrombolysed acute ischemic stroke patients.