Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy · 2025
vNOTES hysterectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: experiences and outcomes in a tertiary center.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bulutlar Eralp, Uluutku Bulutlar Gizem Berfin, Cilli Latife Aslı, Kılıççı Çetin, Şahin Sadık
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study compares vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in terms of clinical outcomes, complications, and recovery.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 143 patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions (vNOTES: 63; TLH: 80). Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: vNOTES had a significantly shorter operative time (87 ± 22 vs. 103 ± 22 min, p < .001) and lower blood loss (138 ± 99 vs. 302 ± 132 cm3, p < .001). Postoperative pain scores were lower on days 1, 3, and 7 (p < .001). Patients ambulated earlier (5.87 ± 1.11 vs. 6.59 ± 1.28 h, p < .001) and resumed daily activities faster (6.83 ± 1.1 vs. 7.89 ± 1.17 days, p < .001). No significant differences were found in hospital stay (p = .10), intraoperative complications (p = 1.000), or re-intervention/readmission rates (p = 1.000).
CONCLUSIONS: vNOTES is a safe, effective alternative to TLH with advantages in efficiency, pain management, and recovery. However, its learning curve may limit widespread use. Further studies are needed to confirm long-term benefits.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 143 patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions (vNOTES: 63; TLH: 80). Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: vNOTES had a significantly shorter operative time (87 ± 22 vs. 103 ± 22 min, p < .001) and lower blood loss (138 ± 99 vs. 302 ± 132 cm3, p < .001). Postoperative pain scores were lower on days 1, 3, and 7 (p < .001). Patients ambulated earlier (5.87 ± 1.11 vs. 6.59 ± 1.28 h, p < .001) and resumed daily activities faster (6.83 ± 1.1 vs. 7.89 ± 1.17 days, p < .001). No significant differences were found in hospital stay (p = .10), intraoperative complications (p = 1.000), or re-intervention/readmission rates (p = 1.000).
CONCLUSIONS: vNOTES is a safe, effective alternative to TLH with advantages in efficiency, pain management, and recovery. However, its learning curve may limit widespread use. Further studies are needed to confirm long-term benefits.