MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1200/jco.24.00326

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024

Enhancing Precision in Detecting Severe Immune-Related Adverse Events: Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models and International Classification of Disease Codes in Patient Records.

Sun Virginia H, Heemelaar Julius C, Hadzic Ibrahim, Raghu Vineet K, Wu Chia-Yun, Zubiri Leyre, Ghamari Azin, LeBoeuf Nicole R, Abu-Shawer Osama, Kehl Kenneth L, Grover Shilpa, Singh Prabhsimranjot, Suero-Abreu Giselle A, Wu Jessica, Falade Ayo S, Grealish Kelley, Thomas Molly F, Hathaway Nora, Medoff Benjamin D, Gilman Hannah K, Villani Alexandra-Chloe, Ho Jor Sam, Mooradian Meghan J, Sise Meghan E, Zlotoff Daniel A, Blum Steven M, Dougan Michael, Sullivan Ryan J, Neilan Tomas G, Reynolds Kerry L

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Current approaches to accurately identify immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in large retrospective studies are limited. Large language models (LLMs) offer a potential solution to this challenge, given their high performance in natural language comprehension tasks. Therefore, we investigated the use of an LLM to identify irAEs among hospitalized patients, comparing its performance with manual adjudication and International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes.

METHODS

Hospital admissions of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy at a single institution from February 5, 2011, to September 5, 2023, were individually reviewed and adjudicated for the presence of irAEs. ICD codes and an LLM with retrieval-augmented generation were applied to detect frequent irAEs (ICI-induced colitis, hepatitis, and pneumonitis) and the most fatal irAE (ICI-myocarditis) from electronic health records. The performance between ICD codes and LLM was compared via sensitivity and specificity with an α = .05, relative to the gold standard of manual adjudication. External validation was performed using a data set of hospital admissions from June 1, 2018, to May 31, 2019, from a second institution.

RESULTS

Of the 7,555 admissions for patients on ICI therapy in the initial cohort, 2.0% were adjudicated to be due to ICI-colitis, 1.1% ICI-hepatitis, 0.7% ICI-pneumonitis, and 0.8% ICI-myocarditis. The LLM demonstrated higher sensitivity than ICD codes (94.7% v 68.7%), achieving significance for ICI-hepatitis (P < .001), myocarditis (P < .001), and pneumonitis (P = .003) while yielding similar specificities (93.7% v 92.4%). The LLM spent an average of 9.53 seconds/chart in comparison with an estimated 15 minutes for adjudication. In the validation cohort (N = 1,270), the mean LLM sensitivity and specificity were 98.1% and 95.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

LLMs are a useful tool for the detection of irAEs, outperforming ICD codes in sensitivity and adjudication in efficiency.

Для цитирования: Sun Virginia H, Heemelaar Julius C, Hadzic Ibrahim, Raghu Vineet K, Wu Chia-Yun, Zubiri Leyre, Ghamari Azin, LeBoeuf Nicole R, Abu-Shawer Osama, Kehl Kenneth L, Grover Shilpa, Singh Prabhsimranjot, Suero-Abreu Giselle A, Wu Jessica, Falade Ayo S, Grealish Kelley, Thomas Molly F, Hathaway Nora, Medoff Benjamin D, Gilman Hannah K, Villani Alexandra-Chloe, Ho Jor Sam, Mooradian Meghan J, Sise Meghan E, Zlotoff Daniel A, Blum Steven M, Dougan Michael, Sullivan Ryan J, Neilan Tomas G, Reynolds Kerry L. Enhancing Precision in Detecting Severe Immune-Related Adverse Events: Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models and International Classification of Disease Codes in Patient Records.. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2024. DOI: 10.1200/jco.24.00326.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.