Ageing behind bars: a photovoice study in a geromedical prison unit.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVES
This study aims to uncover the lived experiences and lifeworld of incarcerated older adults within an underexamined type of carceral setting, through direct engagement with their voices and perspectives.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND
METHODS
By drawing on a Photovoice methodology, the study explored the everyday life of seven incarcerated male older adults (Mage = 68, range = 60-79) residing in a geromedical unit within a Flemish prison, located in northern Belgium. Over the course of 1 week, participants captured their lifeworld through photography, followed by individual photo-elicited interviews and one focus group interview. Participant observation provided additional contextual insights. Data are analyzed using a thematic analysis with an inductive approach.
RESULTS
Three identified themes capture how residents manifested, experienced, and navigated daily life in this prison unit: (1) silent stigma and taint (Figure 1), (2) systemic segregation and isolation (Figure 2), and (3) resilience and redemption (Figures 3 and 4). These themes illuminate the lifeworld of the residents while providing insight into the cultural norms and attitudes prevalent in this unit. Through the use of Photovoice, the study does not only provide a unique platform for participants to share their experiences but also empowers them as active agents in (re)shaping knowledge on carceral ageing.
DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The study highlights the wealth of participants' experiences. It offers valuable insights to inform the development of prison policies, programs, and practices to cultivate positive norms, relationships, and attitudes that challenge and dismantle negative attitudes and systemic barriers associated with carceral ageing.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.