DOI 10.1080/10872981.2025.2500556
Exploring gender differences in empathy development among medical students: a qualitative analysis of reflections on juvenile correctional school visits.
Аннотация
Empathy development is a critical component of medical education, shaping future physicians' ability to provide compassionate, patient-centered care. This study investigates the reflections of male and female medical students on their experiences at a juvenile correctional school, focusing on how gender shapes their interpretations, emotional engagement, and learning outcomes. Using a qualitative analysis of reflective journals collected from 28 participants, the study employed thematic analysis to identify gender-based patterns in emotional engagement, interpretive framing, and learning outcomes. Reflexivity measures and rigorous coding processes were implemented to ensure credibility and minimize bias in data interpretation. Male students frequently adopted a practical form of empathy, characterized by task-oriented interactions and a sense of competitive camaraderie. In contrast, female students exhibited relational empathy, emphasizing emotional connections and nurturing behaviors. These findings underscore the value of integrating gender-sensitive empathy training into medical education, encouraging the development of both relational and practical approaches. By incorporating tailored reflection exercises and interactive strategies, medical education programs can better equip students to engage compassionately with diverse patient populations. This approach enriches the learning experience and fosters a more holistic understanding of patient care, ultimately leading to improved healthcare outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.